HTECX vs. FIKHX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hennessy Technology Fund (HTECX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX).

HTECX is managed by Hennessy. It was launched on Jan 31, 2002. FIKHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.

Performance

HTECX vs. FIKHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Technology Fund (HTECX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HTECX vs. FIKHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HTECX Hennessy Technology Fund	-10.79%	15.48%	17.29%	35.95%	-26.28%	14.75%	24.45%	39.13%	-10.95%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	0.00%	24.77%	35.52%	59.89%	-35.93%	27.74%	64.56%	51.18%	-17.39%

Returns By Period

HTECX

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: -7.40%
• YTD: -10.79%
• 6M: -12.16%
• 1Y: 13.20%
• 3Y*: 12.49%
• 5Y*: 4.99%
• 10Y*: 11.64%

FIKHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTECX vs. FIKHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTECX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKHX's 0.59% expense ratio.

HTECX

Hennessy Technology Fund

FIKHX

Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z

Return for Risk

HTECX vs. FIKHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTECX

HTECX Risk / Return Rank: 19
HTECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
HTECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
HTECX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
HTECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
HTECX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTECX vs. FIKHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Technology Fund (HTECX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTECX	FIKHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.62	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.79	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTECX	FIKHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between HTECX and FIKHX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HTECX vs. FIKHX - Dividend Comparison

HTECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.72%, more than FIKHX's 9.85% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HTECX Hennessy Technology Fund	23.72%	21.16%	4.28%	0.00%	0.07%	33.37%	3.58%	2.65%	15.54%	9.60%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	9.85%	9.85%	7.33%	3.86%	3.32%	11.52%	7.42%	2.64%	22.38%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HTECX	FIKHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.01%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.01%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.21%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HTECX	FIKHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.88%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.04%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.52%	—	—