HTD vs. NFJ
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) and Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund (NFJ).
HTD is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Feb 25, 2004. NFJ is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Feb 28, 2005.
Performance
HTD vs. NFJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HTD vs. NFJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTD John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund | 6.73% | 15.87% | 25.68% | -9.92% | -6.24% | 32.36% | -16.54% | 42.77% | -9.13% | 16.47% |
NFJ Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund | 0.23% | 12.40% | 9.96% | 21.30% | -23.90% | 26.75% | 12.42% | 30.88% | -11.97% | 12.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTD achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly higher than NFJ's 0.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HTD having a 8.93% annualized return and NFJ not far behind at 8.90%.
HTD
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.93%
NFJ
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 14.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HTD vs. NFJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTD has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than NFJ's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
HTD vs. NFJ — Risk / Return Rank
HTD
NFJ
HTD vs. NFJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) and Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund (NFJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HTD | NFJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.85 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 1.26 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.18 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.19 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.63 | 4.60 | -0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HTD | NFJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.85 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.39 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.48 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.27 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between HTD and NFJ is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HTD vs. NFJ - Dividend Comparison
HTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, less than NFJ's 9.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTD John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund | 7.41% | 7.51% | 7.52% | 8.73% | 7.36% | 5.80% | 7.97% | 6.06% | 10.09% | 8.85% | 7.30% | 7.06% |
NFJ Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund | 9.67% | 9.46% | 9.26% | 7.78% | 8.83% | 5.60% | 6.69% | 6.92% | 8.43% | 8.62% | 9.52% | 13.32% |
Drawdowns
HTD vs. NFJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTD drawdown since its inception was -69.79%, which is greater than NFJ's maximum drawdown of -57.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTD and NFJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTD | NFJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.79% | -57.92% | -11.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.27% | -12.61% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.58% | -30.57% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.57% | -40.96% | -15.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -6.65% | +3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -10.88% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 3.25% | +0.19% |
Volatility
HTD vs. NFJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) is 4.59%, while Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund (NFJ) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that HTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HTD | NFJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 5.45% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.56% | 9.43% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 17.10% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 16.99% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.71% | 18.57% | +4.14% |