PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTD vs. EOD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HTD vs. EOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) and Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HTD vs. EOD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HTD
John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund
7.16%15.87%25.68%-9.92%-6.24%32.36%-16.54%42.77%-9.13%16.47%
EOD
Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund
4.54%28.76%25.83%9.78%-17.65%32.87%-3.16%35.96%-12.05%20.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTD achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly higher than EOD's 4.54% return. Over the past 10 years, HTD has underperformed EOD with an annualized return of 8.97%, while EOD has yielded a comparatively higher 10.72% annualized return.


HTD

1D
0.40%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
7.16%
6M
4.44%
1Y
11.78%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
8.97%

EOD

1D
2.23%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
4.54%
6M
8.37%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HTD vs. EOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTD has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than EOD's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

HTD vs. EOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTD
HTD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTD Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
HTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

EOD
EOD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTD vs. EOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) and Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTDEODDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.74

1.70

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.03

2.32

-1.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.36

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.75

-1.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.54

13.69

-10.15

HTD vs. EOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTD Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the EOD Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTD and EOD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTDEODDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

1.70

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.75

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.57

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.21

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between HTD and EOD is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HTD vs. EOD - Dividend Comparison

HTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, less than EOD's 8.74% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTD
John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund
7.38%7.51%7.52%8.73%7.36%5.80%7.97%6.06%10.09%8.85%7.30%7.06%
EOD
Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund
8.74%8.73%9.16%9.98%11.80%8.76%11.41%10.36%13.84%10.56%9.91%12.16%

Drawdowns

HTD vs. EOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTD drawdown since its inception was -69.79%, which is greater than EOD's maximum drawdown of -57.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTD and EOD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HTDEODDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.79%

-57.02%

-12.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.27%

-11.58%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.58%

-25.61%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.57%

-47.08%

-9.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.26%

-2.95%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-13.32%

+4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

2.32%

+1.13%

Volatility

HTD vs. EOD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) is 4.60%, while Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that HTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HTDEODDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

8.15%

-3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

10.99%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

18.50%

-2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

17.39%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.71%

19.02%

+3.69%