PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTB.TO vs. HSAV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTB.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HTB.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTB.TO achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than HSAV.TO's 1.00% return.


HTB.TO

1D
0.08%
1M
0.03%
6M
0.05%
YTD
1.68%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
1.13%

HSAV.TO

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.11%
6M
1.19%
YTD
1.00%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTB.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HTB.TO
Global X US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index Corporate Class ETF
1.68%2.71%8.07%0.76%-9.56%-3.43%2.00%
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF
1.00%2.58%4.24%5.04%2.79%0.66%0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between HTB.TO and HSAV.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2020

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTB.TO vs. HSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTB.TO
HTB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
HTB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
HTB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

HSAV.TO
HSAV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTB.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HTB.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HTB.TOHSAV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

3.92

-2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.34

9.99

-7.65

HTB.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the HSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTB.TO and HSAV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HTB.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTB.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.11%, which is greater than HSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTB.TO and HSAV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTB.TOHSAV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.11%

-2.18%

-23.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.39%

-0.59%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.11%

-1.06%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.89%

-2.18%

-13.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.91%

-0.22%

-11.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.51%

-0.19%

-12.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

0.23%

+2.36%

Volatility

HTB.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HTB.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) at 0.34%. This indicates that HTB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTB.TOHSAV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

0.34%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.50%

0.97%

+3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

1.41%

+4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.35%

1.78%

+7.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.38%

1.57%

+7.81%

Dividends

HTB.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HTB.TO nor HSAV.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HTB.TO and HSAV.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTB.TO is categorized as Government Bonds, while HSAV.TO is Money Market.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTB.TO and HSAV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer