HTAE.TO vs. TECH.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HTAE.TO (Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units) and TECH.TO (Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD) are both Technology Equities funds. HTAE.TO is actively managed, while TECH.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HTAE.TO returned 31.84%/yr vs 24.88%/yr for TECH.TO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HTAE.TO charges 2.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TECH.TO.

Performance

HTAE.TO vs. TECH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO) and Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTAE.TO achieves a 32.62% return, which is significantly higher than TECH.TO's 0.77% return.

HTAE.TO

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 20.35%
• YTD: 32.62%
• 6M: 33.74%
• 1Y: 56.12%
• 3Y*: 31.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TECH.TO

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: -1.50%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 24.88%
• 5Y*: 15.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTAE.TO vs. TECH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HTAE.TO Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units	32.62%	13.49%	28.26%	68.45%	-3.55%
TECH.TO Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD	0.77%	18.22%	40.26%	80.38%	-14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HTAE.TO and TECH.TO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022	0.72

The correlation between HTAE.TO and TECH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HTAE.TO vs. TECH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HTAE.TO	TECH.TO
Technology	90.7%	32.8%
Communication Services	9.3%	49.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	17.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HTAE.TO vs. TECH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTAE.TO

HTAE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 66
HTAE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
HTAE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
HTAE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 65
HTAE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
HTAE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

TECH.TO

TECH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 24
TECH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
TECH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
TECH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 25
TECH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
TECH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTAE.TO vs. TECH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO) and Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTAE.TO	TECH.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	0.93	+1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	1.43	+1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.17	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	0.98	+2.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.12	3.13	+6.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HTAE.TO vs. TECH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTAE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the TECH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTAE.TO and TECH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTAE.TO	TECH.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.57	0.93	+1.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.39	0.58	+0.81

Drawdowns

HTAE.TO vs. TECH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTAE.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.83%, smaller than the maximum TECH.TO drawdown of -47.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTAE.TO and TECH.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTAE.TO	TECH.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.83%	-47.92%	+17.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.39%	-16.59%	-1.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.83%	-24.13%	-6.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-4.31%	+3.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.57%	-12.32%	+7.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.56%	5.17%	+0.39%

Volatility

HTAE.TO vs. TECH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO) at 4.24%. This indicates that HTAE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TECH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTAE.TO	TECH.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.89%	4.24%	+2.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.54%	12.64%	+4.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.98%	17.45%	+4.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.99%	26.44%	+0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.99%	26.37%	+0.62%

HTAE.TO vs. TECH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTAE.TO has a 2.49% expense ratio, which is higher than TECH.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

HTAE.TO vs. TECH.TO - Dividend Comparison

HTAE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than TECH.TO's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HTAE.TO Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units	9.31%	11.28%	10.01%	9.38%	2.20%	0.00%
TECH.TO Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD	0.12%	0.12%	0.14%	0.20%	0.35%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTAE.TO and TECH.TO in my portfolio?

HTAE.TO and TECH.TO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HTAE.TO or TECH.TO?

On fees, TECH.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HTAE.TO or TECH.TO?

TECH.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 2.49% for HTAE.TO.

What is the main difference between HTAE.TO and TECH.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 2.49% for HTAE.TO and 0.40% for TECH.TO.