PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HTAE.TO vs. HPF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HTAE.TO vs. HPF.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

HTAE.TO (Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units) and HPF.TO (Harvest Energy Leaders Income ETF Class A CAD Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - HTAE.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Harvest, while HPF.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HTAE.TO returned 26.73%/yr vs 14.19%/yr for HPF.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HTAE.TO vs. HPF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO) and Harvest Energy Leaders Income ETF Class A CAD Hedged (HPF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTAE.TO achieves a 25.49% return, which is significantly lower than HPF.TO's 28.72% return.

HTAE.TO

1D
-1.71%
1M
-3.79%
6M
26.23%
YTD
25.49%
1Y
36.52%
3Y*
26.73%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

HPF.TO

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.08%
6M
22.63%
YTD
28.72%
1Y
37.02%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
16.67%
10Y*
5.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTAE.TO vs. HPF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units		25.49%13.45%28.26%68.48%-3.64%
HPF.TO
Harvest Energy Leaders Income ETF Class A CAD Hedged		28.72%8.98%-2.46%2.51%2.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HTAE.TO and HPF.TO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2022

0.11

The correlation between HTAE.TO and HPF.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units

Harvest Energy Leaders Income ETF Class A CAD Hedged

Often compared with HTAE.TO:
HTAE.TO vs. HHIS.TOHTAE.TO vs. QMAX.TOHTAE.TO vs. QQCL.TOHTAE.TO vs. QQC-F.TOHTAE.TO vs. HDIF.TOHTAE.TO vs. HDIV.TOHTAE.TO vs. QQQY.TO

Return for Risk

HTAE.TO vs. HPF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HTAE.TO
HTAE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HTAE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
HPF.TO
HPF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
HPF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
HPF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTAE.TO vs. HPF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO) and Harvest Energy Leaders Income ETF Class A CAD Hedged (HPF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

HTAE.TOHPF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.37
1.89

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.80
2.49

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

3.10

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

9.15

-2.98

HTAE.TO vs. HPF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTAE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the HPF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTAE.TO and HPF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HTAE.TO vs. HPF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTAE.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.83%, smaller than the maximum HPF.TO drawdown of -72.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTAE.TO and HPF.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HTAE.TOHPF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.83%

-72.97%

+42.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.39%

-12.01%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.83%

-22.85%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-23.87%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-69.11%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.37%

-5.69%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-26.28%

+21.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.93%

4.06%

+1.87%

Volatility

HTAE.TO vs. HPF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.18% compared to Harvest Energy Leaders Income ETF Class A CAD Hedged (HPF.TO) at 6.52%. This indicates that HTAE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HTAE.TOHPF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.18%

6.52%

+6.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.37%

16.30%

+7.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.87%

19.76%

+7.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.86%

23.66%

+4.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.86%

28.03%

-0.17%

Dividends

HTAE.TO vs. HPF.TO - Dividend Comparison

HTAE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, more than HPF.TO's 8.04% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HPF.TO
Harvest Energy Leaders Income ETF Class A CAD Hedged		8.04%9.93%9.80%8.75%6.58%4.61%15.32%8.74%8.78%12.87%13.58%13.31%
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units		10.00%11.28%10.01%9.40%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

HTAE.TO and HPF.TO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTAE.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while HPF.TO is Energy Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTAE.TO and HPF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer