HTAE.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HTAE.TO (Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units) and CHPS-U.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTAE.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Harvest, while CHPS-U.TO is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index. HTAE.TO is actively managed, while CHPS-U.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HTAE.TO returned 31.84%/yr vs 50.72%/yr for CHPS-U.TO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HTAE.TO charges 2.49%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CHPS-U.TO.

Performance

HTAE.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HTAE.TO is traded in CAD, while CHPS-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CHPS-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTAE.TO achieves a 32.62% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS-U.TO's 62.44% return.

HTAE.TO

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 20.35%
• YTD: 32.62%
• 6M: 33.74%
• 1Y: 56.12%
• 3Y*: 31.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS-U.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 26.43%
• YTD: 62.44%
• 6M: 58.58%
• 1Y: 135.37%
• 3Y*: 50.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTAE.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HTAE.TO Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units	32.62%	13.49%	28.26%	68.45%	-3.55%
CHPS-U.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF	64.94%	44.87%	21.17%	71.89%	8.51%

Correlation

The correlation between HTAE.TO and CHPS-U.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022	0.13

Return for Risk

HTAE.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTAE.TO

HTAE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 66
HTAE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
HTAE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
HTAE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 65
HTAE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
HTAE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

CHPS-U.TO

CHPS-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
CHPS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CHPS-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CHPS-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CHPS-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTAE.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTAE.TO	CHPS-U.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	3.91	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	4.34	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.60	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	9.95	-6.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.12	32.16	-22.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HTAE.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTAE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is lower than the CHPS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTAE.TO and CHPS-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTAE.TO	CHPS-U.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.57	3.91	-1.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.39	0.64	+0.75

Drawdowns

HTAE.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTAE.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.83%, smaller than the maximum CHPS-U.TO drawdown of -48.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTAE.TO and CHPS-U.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTAE.TO	CHPS-U.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.83%	-48.89%	+18.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.39%	-13.68%	-4.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.83%	-36.00%	+5.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	0.00%	-1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.57%	-15.05%	+10.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.56%	4.23%	+1.33%

Volatility

HTAE.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO) is 6.89%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) has a volatility of 11.05%. This indicates that HTAE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTAE.TO	CHPS-U.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.89%	11.05%	-4.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.54%	27.21%	-9.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.98%	34.86%	-12.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.99%	38.67%	-11.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.99%	38.67%	-11.68%

HTAE.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTAE.TO has a 2.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS-U.TO's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

HTAE.TO vs. CHPS-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

HTAE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, while CHPS-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CHPS-U.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF	0.00%	0.01%	0.14%	0.40%	0.72%	0.01%
HTAE.TO Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units	9.31%	11.28%	10.01%	9.38%	2.20%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTAE.TO and CHPS-U.TO in my portfolio?

HTAE.TO and CHPS-U.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HTAE.TO or CHPS-U.TO?

On fees, CHPS-U.TO is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HTAE.TO or CHPS-U.TO?

CHPS-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 2.49% for HTAE.TO.

What is the main difference between HTAE.TO and CHPS-U.TO?

HTAE.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS-U.TO is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 2.49% for HTAE.TO and 0.63% for CHPS-U.TO.