PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTAB vs. FSEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HTAB vs. FSEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) and Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HTAB vs. FSEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HTAB
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF
0.72%2.86%1.52%7.16%-8.33%0.46%
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
0.63%8.33%2.40%5.22%-12.62%-0.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTAB achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly higher than FSEC's 0.63% return.


HTAB

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.85%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*

FSEC

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
0.63%
6M
1.67%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
4.45%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HTAB vs. FSEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTAB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FSEC's 0.36% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HTAB vs. FSEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTAB
HTAB Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
HTAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTAB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HTAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTAB Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FSEC
FSEC Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTAB vs. FSEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) and Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTABFSECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.69

0.89

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.95

1.28

-0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

1.22

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.95

3.30

-1.35

HTAB vs. FSEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the FSEC Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTAB and FSEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTABFSECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

0.89

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.08

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.06

+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between HTAB and FSEC is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HTAB vs. FSEC - Dividend Comparison

HTAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than FSEC's 4.42% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HTAB
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF
3.91%3.88%3.57%3.21%2.26%2.18%1.64%2.77%1.61%
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
4.42%4.22%3.22%3.41%2.21%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HTAB vs. FSEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTAB drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, smaller than the maximum FSEC drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTAB and FSEC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HTABFSECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-17.97%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-4.08%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.76%

-17.97%

+3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-1.43%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-6.81%

+3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

1.51%

+0.30%

Volatility

HTAB vs. FSEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) is 1.69%, while Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) has a volatility of 1.90%. This indicates that HTAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HTABFSECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

1.90%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.58%

3.35%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.67%

6.39%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.70%

6.72%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.19%

6.67%

-1.48%