PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HTA.TO vs. XIT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HTA.TO vs. XIT.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HTA.TO (Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF) and XIT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. HTA.TO is actively managed, while XIT.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HTA.TO returned 20.58%/yr vs 17.57%/yr for XIT.TO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HTA.TO charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XIT.TO.

Performance

HTA.TO vs. XIT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTA.TO achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than XIT.TO's -4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, HTA.TO has outperformed XIT.TO with an annualized return of 20.58%, while XIT.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 17.57% annualized return.

HTA.TO

1D
-0.94%
1M
16.27%
YTD
26.21%
6M
26.86%
1Y
44.88%
3Y*
26.62%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
20.58%

XIT.TO

1D
-3.62%
1M
5.49%
YTD
-4.19%
6M
-5.79%
1Y
9.80%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
17.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTA.TO vs. XIT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HTA.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF		26.21%12.42%23.53%52.86%-32.21%42.59%30.02%32.48%-0.73%34.20%
XIT.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF		-4.19%15.48%30.02%55.56%-35.85%10.73%45.91%60.77%11.71%17.06%

Correlation

The correlation between HTA.TO and XIT.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015

0.63

The correlation between HTA.TO and XIT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HTA.TO vs. XIT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HTA.TO
XIT.TO

Technology

90.1%
99.8%

Communication Services

9.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.8%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

HTA.TO
90.1%
XIT.TO
99.8%

Communication Services

HTA.TO
9.9%
XIT.TO

-

Basic Materials

HTA.TO

-

XIT.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

HTA.TO

-

XIT.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HTA.TO

-

XIT.TO

-

Energy

HTA.TO

-

XIT.TO

-

Financial Services

HTA.TO

-

XIT.TO
0.8%

Healthcare

HTA.TO

-

XIT.TO

-

Industrials

HTA.TO

-

XIT.TO
0.2%

Real Estate

HTA.TO

-

XIT.TO

-

Utilities

HTA.TO

-

XIT.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF

Often compared with HTA.TO:
HTA.TO vs. HTAE.TOHTA.TO vs. VGG.TOHTA.TO vs. TEC.TOHTA.TO vs. MTRX.TOHTA.TO vs. QQCC.TOHTA.TO vs. DIV.TOHTA.TO vs. HDIV.TO
Often compared with XIT.TO:
XIT.TO vs. XIU.TOXIT.TO vs. VGTXIT.TO vs. XQQ.TOXIT.TO vs. SPYXIT.TO vs. XUS.TOXIT.TO vs. QQQXIT.TO vs. XUU.TO

Return for Risk

HTA.TO vs. XIT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HTA.TO
HTA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HTA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
XIT.TO
XIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTA.TO vs. XIT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HTA.TOXIT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.52
0.31

+2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.25
0.64

+2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.08

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

0.31

+2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.32

0.62

+9.69

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HTA.TO vs. XIT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the XIT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTA.TO and XIT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HTA.TOXIT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

0.31

+2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.28

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.66

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.30

+0.44

Drawdowns

HTA.TO vs. XIT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTA.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, smaller than the maximum XIT.TO drawdown of -81.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTA.TO and XIT.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HTA.TOXIT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.77%

-81.18%

+42.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.87%

-31.93%

+17.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.02%

-31.93%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.77%

-54.15%

+15.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.77%

-54.15%

+15.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-14.47%

+13.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.23%

-26.86%

+18.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.36%

15.74%

-11.38%

Volatility

HTA.TO vs. XIT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) is 5.64%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) has a volatility of 11.83%. This indicates that HTA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HTA.TOXIT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

11.83%

-6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.56%

24.39%

-9.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.91%

31.36%

-13.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.53%

29.37%

-5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

26.71%

-3.63%

HTA.TO vs. XIT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTA.TO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XIT.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

HTA.TO vs. XIT.TO - Dividend Comparison

HTA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, while XIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTA.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF		7.70%8.80%8.11%7.81%9.99%4.27%5.52%6.12%7.58%7.03%8.74%5.29%
XIT.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.29%0.00%0.13%0.14%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

HTA.TO and XIT.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIT.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIT.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HTA.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Harvest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HTA.TO and 0.60% for XIT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTA.TO and XIT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer