HTA.TO vs. QDAY.NEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HTA.TO (Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF) and QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTA.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Harvest, while QDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HTA.TO charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for QDAY.NEO.

Performance

HTA.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTA.TO achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly lower than QDAY.NEO's 31.76% return.

HTA.TO

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: 16.27%
• YTD: 26.21%
• 6M: 26.86%
• 1Y: 44.88%
• 3Y*: 26.62%
• 5Y*: 17.70%
• 10Y*: 20.58%

QDAY.NEO

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 18.94%
• YTD: 31.76%
• 6M: 28.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTA.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HTA.TO Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF	26.21%	7.94%
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF	31.76%	14.84%

Correlation

The correlation between HTA.TO and QDAY.NEO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

HTA.TO vs. QDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTA.TO

HTA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 67
HTA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
HTA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
HTA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
HTA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
HTA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTA.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTA.TO	QDAY.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.32	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTA.TO	QDAY.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	2.63	-1.90

Drawdowns

HTA.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTA.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, which is greater than QDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -19.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTA.TO and QDAY.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTA.TO	QDAY.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.77%	-19.44%	-19.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	0.00%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.23%	-5.23%	-3.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.36%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HTA.TO	QDAY.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.64%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.56%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.91%	22.72%	-4.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.53%	22.72%	+0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.08%	22.72%	+0.36%

HTA.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTA.TO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QDAY.NEO's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

HTA.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison

HTA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, less than QDAY.NEO's 13.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HTA.TO Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF	7.70%	8.80%	8.11%	7.81%	9.99%	4.27%	5.52%	6.12%	7.58%	7.03%	8.74%	5.29%
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF	13.90%	8.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTA.TO and QDAY.NEO in my portfolio?

HTA.TO and QDAY.NEO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HTA.TO or QDAY.NEO?

On fees, QDAY.NEO is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HTA.TO or QDAY.NEO?

QDAY.NEO is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HTA.TO.

What is the main difference between HTA.TO and QDAY.NEO?

HTA.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while QDAY.NEO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HTA.TO and 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.