PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSXJ.L is traded in GBP, while XDJP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDJP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HSXJ.L having a 26.74% return and XDJP.L slightly higher at 27.84%.


HSXJ.L

1D
-1.64%
1M
-7.17%
6M
19.06%
YTD
26.74%
1Y
44.94%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*

XDJP.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
-5.80%
6M
19.60%
YTD
27.84%
1Y
55.28%
3Y*
21.21%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSXJ.L
HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
26.74%23.28%16.71%-1.43%-5.93%0.54%-10.38%
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
27.84%21.04%9.68%15.52%-10.26%-3.79%18.25%

Correlation

The correlation between HSXJ.L and XDJP.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2020

0.57

The correlation between HSXJ.L and XDJP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (5 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSXJ.L
XDJP.L

Technology

52.2%
33.3%

Financial Services

20.1%
2.9%

Basic Materials

10.1%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
16.6%

Industrials

4.1%
18.2%

Energy

2.2%
0.3%

Healthcare

2.0%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
2.9%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.2%

Utilities

0.8%
0.1%

Communication Services

0.4%
14.3%

Technology

HSXJ.L
52.2%
XDJP.L
33.3%

Financial Services

HSXJ.L
20.1%
XDJP.L
2.9%

Basic Materials

HSXJ.L
10.1%
XDJP.L
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HSXJ.L
6.1%
XDJP.L
16.6%

Industrials

HSXJ.L
4.1%
XDJP.L
18.2%

Energy

HSXJ.L
2.2%
XDJP.L
0.3%

Healthcare

HSXJ.L
2.0%
XDJP.L
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

HSXJ.L
1.2%
XDJP.L
2.9%

Real Estate

HSXJ.L
0.9%
XDJP.L
1.2%

Utilities

HSXJ.L
0.8%
XDJP.L
0.1%

Communication Services

HSXJ.L
0.4%
XDJP.L
14.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSXJ.L
HSXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HSXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSXJ.LXDJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.36

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

4.10

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

11.48

0.00

HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSXJ.L and XDJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, smaller than the maximum XDJP.L drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSXJ.L and XDJP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSXJ.LXDJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.60%

-99.99%

+74.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.58%

-13.40%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.13%

-18.82%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.13%

-20.61%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.58%

-99.97%

+88.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-99.40%

+88.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

4.80%

-0.89%

Volatility

HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) have volatilities of 10.01% and 10.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSXJ.LXDJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.01%

10.04%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.08%

20.50%

-2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.20%

24.96%

-4.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.85%

18.40%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

17.48%

+5.51%

HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSXJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XDJP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Dividend Comparison

HSXJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSXJ.L
HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
1.07%1.33%1.41%1.60%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSXJ.L and XDJP.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HSXJ.L.

HSXJ.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XDJP.L is Japan Equities. HSXJ.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HSXJ.L and 0.09% for XDJP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSXJ.L and XDJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer