HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L
HSXJ.L (HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) and XDJP.L (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - HSXJ.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while XDJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSXJ.L returned 10.36%/yr vs 12.29%/yr for XDJP.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSXJ.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XDJP.L.
Performance
HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HSXJ.L is traded in GBP, while XDJP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDJP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HSXJ.L having a 26.74% return and XDJP.L slightly higher at 27.84%.
HSXJ.L
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- 6M
- 19.06%
- YTD
- 26.74%
- 1Y
- 44.94%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- —
XDJP.L
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- 6M
- 19.60%
- YTD
- 27.84%
- 1Y
- 55.28%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.68%
HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSXJ.L HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 26.74% | 23.28% | 16.71% | -1.43% | -5.93% | 0.54% | -10.38% |
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 27.84% | 21.04% | 9.68% | 15.52% | -10.26% | -3.79% | 18.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSXJ.L and XDJP.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between HSXJ.L and XDJP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (5 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSXJ.L
XDJP.L
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
HSXJ.L
XDJP.L
Financial Services
HSXJ.L
XDJP.L
Basic Materials
HSXJ.L
XDJP.L
Consumer Cyclical
HSXJ.L
XDJP.L
Industrials
HSXJ.L
XDJP.L
Energy
HSXJ.L
XDJP.L
Healthcare
HSXJ.L
XDJP.L
Consumer Defensive
HSXJ.L
XDJP.L
Real Estate
HSXJ.L
XDJP.L
Utilities
HSXJ.L
XDJP.L
Communication Services
HSXJ.L
XDJP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L — Risk / Return Rank
HSXJ.L
XDJP.L
HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSXJ.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.36 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 4.10 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | 11.48 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, smaller than the maximum XDJP.L drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSXJ.L and XDJP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSXJ.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.60% | -99.99% | +74.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -13.40% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.13% | -18.82% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.13% | -20.61% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.58% | -99.97% | +88.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -99.40% | +88.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 4.80% | -0.89% |
Volatility
HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) have volatilities of 10.01% and 10.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSXJ.L | XDJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.01% | 10.04% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.08% | 20.50% | -2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 24.96% | -4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.85% | 18.40% | +3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.99% | 17.48% | +5.51% |
HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSXJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XDJP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HSXJ.L vs. XDJP.L - Dividend Comparison
HSXJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSXJ.L HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.07% | 1.33% | 1.41% | 1.60% | 2.47% | 1.20% | 1.11% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 0.72% | 0.83% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSXJ.L and XDJP.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HSXJ.L.
HSXJ.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XDJP.L is Japan Equities. HSXJ.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HSXJ.L and 0.09% for XDJP.L.
Find the right allocation for HSXJ.L and XDJP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer