HSXJ.L vs. XCHA.L

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

HSXJ.L (HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) and XCHA.L (Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - HSXJ.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while XCHA.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSXJ.L returned 10.36%/yr vs 2.69%/yr for XCHA.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSXJ.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XCHA.L.

Performance

HSXJ.L vs. XCHA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HSXJ.L is traded in GBP, while XCHA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XCHA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSXJ.L achieves a 26.74% return, which is significantly higher than XCHA.L's 7.46% return.

HSXJ.L

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -7.17%
• 6M: 19.06%
• YTD: 26.74%
• 1Y: 44.94%
• 3Y*: 22.69%
• 5Y*: 10.36%
• 10Y*: —

XCHA.L

• 1D: -1.67%
• 1M: -3.65%
• 6M: 3.05%
• YTD: 7.46%
• 1Y: 30.49%
• 3Y*: 12.63%
• 5Y*: 2.69%
• 10Y*: 8.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSXJ.L vs. XCHA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HSXJ.L HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD	26.74%	23.28%	16.71%	-1.43%	-5.93%	0.54%	-10.38%
XCHA.L Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C	7.46%	20.84%	18.03%	-15.45%	-15.25%	4.22%	14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between HSXJ.L and XCHA.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2020	0.60

The correlation between HSXJ.L and XCHA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSXJ.L vs. XCHA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HSXJ.L	XCHA.L
Technology	52.2%	31.6%
Financial Services	20.1%	18.8%
Basic Materials	10.1%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	6.2%
Industrials	4.1%	16.0%
Energy	2.2%	2.7%
Healthcare	2.0%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	6.6%
Real Estate	0.9%	0.4%
Utilities	0.8%	2.9%
Communication Services	0.4%	1.5%

Return for Risk

HSXJ.L vs. XCHA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSXJ.L

HSXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
HSXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
HSXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
HSXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
HSXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

XCHA.L

XCHA.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
XCHA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
XCHA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XCHA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
XCHA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
XCHA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSXJ.L vs. XCHA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSXJ.L	XCHA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	1.61	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	2.22	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.29	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.86	3.59	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.47	11.30	+0.17

HSXJ.L vs. XCHA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the XCHA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSXJ.L and XCHA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HSXJ.L vs. XCHA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, smaller than the maximum XCHA.L drawdown of -47.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSXJ.L and XCHA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSXJ.L	XCHA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.60%	-47.44%	+21.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.58%	-8.46%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.13%	-24.79%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.13%	-36.94%	+12.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.58%	-8.46%	-3.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.88%	-18.38%	+7.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.91%	2.69%	+1.22%

Volatility

HSXJ.L vs. XCHA.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L) at 8.64%. This indicates that HSXJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCHA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSXJ.L	XCHA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.01%	8.64%	+1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.08%	14.35%	+3.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.20%	18.85%	+1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.85%	21.74%	+0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.99%	22.57%	+0.42%

HSXJ.L vs. XCHA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSXJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XCHA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSXJ.L vs. XCHA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HSXJ.L nor XCHA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSXJ.L and XCHA.L in my portfolio?

HSXJ.L and XCHA.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HSXJ.L or XCHA.L?

On fees, HSXJ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSXJ.L or XCHA.L?

HSXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHA.L.

What is the main difference between HSXJ.L and XCHA.L?

HSXJ.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XCHA.L is China Equities. HSXJ.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while XCHA.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HSXJ.L and 0.50% for XCHA.L.