HSXJ.L vs. VWRA.L
HSXJ.L (HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) and VWRA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - HSXJ.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while VWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSXJ.L returned 11.56%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for VWRA.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSXJ.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VWRA.L.
Performance
HSXJ.L vs. VWRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HSXJ.L is traded in GBP, while VWRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VWRA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSXJ.L achieves a 34.70% return, which is significantly higher than VWRA.L's 12.10% return.
HSXJ.L
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 11.50%
- YTD
- 34.70%
- 6M
- 37.46%
- 1Y
- 65.64%
- 3Y*
- 24.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- —
VWRA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 12.31%
- 1Y
- 29.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
HSXJ.L vs. VWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSXJ.L HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 34.70% | 23.23% | 16.70% | -1.41% | -5.93% | 0.54% | 16.27% |
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 12.05% | 13.73% | 19.70% | 16.17% | -8.37% | 19.58% | 8.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSXJ.L and VWRA.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2020 | 0.66 |
The correlation between HSXJ.L and VWRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
HSXJ.L vs. VWRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSXJ.L
VWRA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
HSXJ.L
VWRA.L
Financial Services
HSXJ.L
VWRA.L
Basic Materials
HSXJ.L
VWRA.L
Consumer Cyclical
HSXJ.L
VWRA.L
Industrials
HSXJ.L
VWRA.L
Energy
HSXJ.L
VWRA.L
Healthcare
HSXJ.L
VWRA.L
Consumer Defensive
HSXJ.L
VWRA.L
Real Estate
HSXJ.L
VWRA.L
Utilities
HSXJ.L
VWRA.L
Communication Services
HSXJ.L
VWRA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSXJ.L vs. VWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
HSXJ.L
VWRA.L
HSXJ.L vs. VWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSXJ.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.48 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.98 | 4.30 | +1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.00 | 16.58 | +4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSXJ.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.83 | 2.52 | +1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.89 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.76 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
HSXJ.L vs. VWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, roughly equal to the maximum VWRA.L drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSXJ.L and VWRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSXJ.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.60% | -25.64% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.93% | -6.93% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.39% | -18.10% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.07% | -18.10% | -2.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -0.40% | -2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.52% | -3.46% | -6.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 1.80% | +1.32% |
Volatility
HSXJ.L vs. VWRA.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) at 3.77%. This indicates that HSXJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSXJ.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 3.77% | +4.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.25% | 9.25% | +5.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 11.83% | +5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 14.06% | +2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 16.05% | +0.26% |
HSXJ.L vs. VWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSXJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRA.L's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HSXJ.L vs. VWRA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HSXJ.L nor VWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HSXJ.L and VWRA.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VWRA.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HSXJ.L.
HSXJ.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VWRA.L is Global Equities. HSXJ.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HSXJ.L and 0.22% for VWRA.L.
Find the right allocation for HSXJ.L and VWRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer