HSXJ.L vs. IDTW.L

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

HSXJ.L (HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) and IDTW.L (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - HSXJ.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while IDTW.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSXJ.L returned 10.36%/yr vs 20.31%/yr for IDTW.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSXJ.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IDTW.L.

Performance

HSXJ.L vs. IDTW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HSXJ.L is traded in GBP, while IDTW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDTW.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSXJ.L achieves a 26.74% return, which is significantly lower than IDTW.L's 58.02% return.

HSXJ.L

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -7.17%
• 6M: 19.06%
• YTD: 26.74%
• 1Y: 44.94%
• 3Y*: 22.69%
• 5Y*: 10.36%
• 10Y*: —

IDTW.L

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -5.17%
• 6M: 46.70%
• YTD: 58.02%
• 1Y: 82.77%
• 3Y*: 38.04%
• 5Y*: 20.31%
• 10Y*: 20.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSXJ.L vs. IDTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HSXJ.L HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD	26.74%	23.28%	16.71%	-1.43%	-5.93%	0.54%	-10.38%
IDTW.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	58.02%	22.39%	25.77%	22.40%	-21.17%	29.73%	15.51%

Correlation

The correlation between HSXJ.L and IDTW.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2020	0.73

The correlation between HSXJ.L and IDTW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HSXJ.L vs. IDTW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSXJ.L

HSXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
HSXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
HSXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
HSXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
HSXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

IDTW.L

IDTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
IDTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
IDTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
IDTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
IDTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
IDTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSXJ.L vs. IDTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSXJ.L	IDTW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	3.08	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	3.70	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.50	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.86	6.65	-2.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.47	20.04	-8.57

HSXJ.L vs. IDTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the IDTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSXJ.L and IDTW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HSXJ.L vs. IDTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, smaller than the maximum IDTW.L drawdown of -47.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSXJ.L and IDTW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSXJ.L	IDTW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.60%	-47.00%	+21.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.58%	-12.38%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.13%	-29.91%	+5.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.13%	-30.18%	+6.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.58%	-12.38%	+0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.88%	-9.11%	-1.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.91%	4.11%	-0.20%

Volatility

HSXJ.L vs. IDTW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) is 10.01%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) has a volatility of 11.25%. This indicates that HSXJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSXJ.L	IDTW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.01%	11.25%	-1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.08%	23.20%	-5.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.20%	26.74%	-6.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.85%	22.45%	-0.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.99%	21.76%	+1.23%

HSXJ.L vs. IDTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSXJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IDTW.L's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSXJ.L vs. IDTW.L - Dividend Comparison

HSXJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDTW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HSXJ.L HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IDTW.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	0.95%	1.51%	1.43%	2.09%	3.39%	1.35%	1.73%	2.15%	2.78%	2.70%	3.10%	3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSXJ.L and IDTW.L in my portfolio?

HSXJ.L and IDTW.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HSXJ.L or IDTW.L?

On fees, HSXJ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSXJ.L or IDTW.L?

HSXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDTW.L.

What is the main difference between HSXJ.L and IDTW.L?

HSXJ.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IDTW.L is Technology Equities. HSXJ.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while IDTW.L tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD). They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HSXJ.L and 0.74% for IDTW.L.