PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSXJ.L vs. 3KOR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSXJ.L vs. 3KOR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSXJ.L is traded in GBP, while 3KOR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3KOR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSXJ.L achieves a 26.74% return, which is significantly lower than 3KOR.L's 112.30% return.


HSXJ.L

1D
-1.64%
1M
-7.17%
6M
19.06%
YTD
26.74%
1Y
44.94%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*

3KOR.L

1D
-5.37%
1M
-57.21%
6M
44.93%
YTD
112.30%
1Y
358.21%
3Y*
46.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSXJ.L vs. 3KOR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HSXJ.L
HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
26.74%23.28%16.71%-1.43%-1.20%
3KOR.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities
112.30%324.15%-61.68%9.27%-54.74%

Correlation

The correlation between HSXJ.L and 3KOR.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2022

0.69

The correlation between HSXJ.L and 3KOR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HSXJ.L vs. 3KOR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSXJ.L
3KOR.L

Technology

52.2%
63.4%

Financial Services

20.1%
7.4%

Basic Materials

10.1%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
5.5%

Industrials

4.1%
15.2%

Energy

2.2%
0.9%

Healthcare

2.0%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
1.3%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Utilities

0.8%
0.3%

Communication Services

0.4%
2.1%

Technology

HSXJ.L
52.2%
3KOR.L
63.4%

Financial Services

HSXJ.L
20.1%
3KOR.L
7.4%

Basic Materials

HSXJ.L
10.1%
3KOR.L
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HSXJ.L
6.1%
3KOR.L
5.5%

Industrials

HSXJ.L
4.1%
3KOR.L
15.2%

Energy

HSXJ.L
2.2%
3KOR.L
0.9%

Healthcare

HSXJ.L
2.0%
3KOR.L
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

HSXJ.L
1.2%
3KOR.L
1.3%

Real Estate

HSXJ.L
0.9%
3KOR.L

-

Utilities

HSXJ.L
0.8%
3KOR.L
0.3%

Communication Services

HSXJ.L
0.4%
3KOR.L
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSXJ.L vs. 3KOR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSXJ.L
HSXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HSXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

3KOR.L
3KOR.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
3KOR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSXJ.L vs. 3KOR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSXJ.L3KOR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.38

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

5.34

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

14.76

-3.29

HSXJ.L vs. 3KOR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the 3KOR.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSXJ.L and 3KOR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSXJ.L vs. 3KOR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, smaller than the maximum 3KOR.L drawdown of -85.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSXJ.L and 3KOR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSXJ.L3KOR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.60%

-85.83%

+60.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.58%

-66.61%

+55.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.13%

-74.96%

+50.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.58%

-66.61%

+55.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-52.68%

+41.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

24.13%

-20.22%

Volatility

HSXJ.L vs. 3KOR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) is 10.01%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) has a volatility of 60.39%. This indicates that HSXJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3KOR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSXJ.L3KOR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.01%

60.39%

-50.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.08%

119.51%

-101.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.20%

128.49%

-108.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.85%

86.80%

-64.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

86.80%

-63.81%

HSXJ.L vs. 3KOR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSXJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than 3KOR.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSXJ.L vs. 3KOR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HSXJ.L nor 3KOR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HSXJ.L and 3KOR.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSXJ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3KOR.L.

HSXJ.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while 3KOR.L is South Korea Equities. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HSXJ.L and 0.75% for 3KOR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSXJ.L and 3KOR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer