PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSUS.L vs. LCUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HSUS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
8.60%
YTD
13.96%
6M
14.87%
1Y
35.83%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
14.02%
10Y*

LCUS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSUS.L
HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
13.96%10.79%21.83%15.09%-7.73%29.76%11.33%
LCUS.L
Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%3.57%27.38%20.34%-12.04%27.36%9.44%

Correlation

The correlation between HSUS.L and LCUS.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020

0.84

The correlation between HSUS.L and LCUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (3 years) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HSUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSUS.L
LCUS.L

Technology

45.5%
31.9%

Financial Services

14.4%
13.6%

Healthcare

13.8%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
11.6%

Communication Services

6.5%
10.0%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.8%

Industrials

2.8%
7.7%

Energy

2.2%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
5.3%

Real Estate

0.6%
2.1%

Utilities

0.2%
2.4%

Technology

HSUS.L
45.5%
LCUS.L
31.9%

Financial Services

HSUS.L
14.4%
LCUS.L
13.6%

Healthcare

HSUS.L
13.8%
LCUS.L
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HSUS.L
8.2%
LCUS.L
11.6%

Communication Services

HSUS.L
6.5%
LCUS.L
10.0%

Basic Materials

HSUS.L
4.0%
LCUS.L
1.8%

Industrials

HSUS.L
2.8%
LCUS.L
7.7%

Energy

HSUS.L
2.2%
LCUS.L
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

HSUS.L
2.0%
LCUS.L
5.3%

Real Estate

HSUS.L
0.6%
LCUS.L
2.1%

Utilities

HSUS.L
0.2%
LCUS.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSUS.L vs. LCUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSUS.L
HSUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HSUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSUS.LLCUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.41

HSUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSUS.LLCUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

Drawdowns

HSUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSUS.LLCUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

Volatility

HSUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSUS.LLCUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

HSUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSUS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HSUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HSUS.L nor LCUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HSUS.L
HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCUS.L
Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.83%0.77%0.69%0.48%0.02%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSUS.L and LCUS.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for HSUS.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for HSUS.L and 0.04% for LCUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSUS.L and LCUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer