PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSUS.L vs. HWWA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSUS.L vs. HWWA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) and HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HSUS.L having a 13.96% return and HWWA.L slightly higher at 14.08%.


HSUS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
8.60%
YTD
13.96%
6M
14.87%
1Y
35.83%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
14.02%
10Y*

HWWA.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
6.39%
YTD
14.08%
6M
15.66%
1Y
34.98%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
13.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSUS.L vs. HWWA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSUS.L
HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
13.96%10.79%21.83%15.09%-7.73%29.76%11.33%
HWWA.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF
14.08%16.74%17.83%15.71%-7.83%21.70%11.53%

Correlation

The correlation between HSUS.L and HWWA.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020

0.90

The correlation between HSUS.L and HWWA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSUS.L vs. HWWA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSUS.L
HWWA.L

Technology

45.5%
34.2%

Financial Services

14.4%
14.0%

Healthcare

13.8%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
8.3%

Communication Services

6.5%
8.4%

Basic Materials

4.0%
5.8%

Industrials

2.8%
13.2%

Energy

2.2%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
2.2%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.4%

Utilities

0.2%
2.5%

Technology

HSUS.L
45.5%
HWWA.L
34.2%

Financial Services

HSUS.L
14.4%
HWWA.L
14.0%

Healthcare

HSUS.L
13.8%
HWWA.L
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HSUS.L
8.2%
HWWA.L
8.3%

Communication Services

HSUS.L
6.5%
HWWA.L
8.4%

Basic Materials

HSUS.L
4.0%
HWWA.L
5.8%

Industrials

HSUS.L
2.8%
HWWA.L
13.2%

Energy

HSUS.L
2.2%
HWWA.L
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

HSUS.L
2.0%
HWWA.L
2.2%

Real Estate

HSUS.L
0.6%
HWWA.L
1.4%

Utilities

HSUS.L
0.2%
HWWA.L
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSUS.L vs. HWWA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSUS.L
HSUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HSUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

HWWA.L
HWWA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSUS.L vs. HWWA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) and HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSUS.LHWWA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.65

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.33

5.16

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.41

21.78

+0.63

HSUS.L vs. HWWA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is comparable to the HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSUS.L and HWWA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSUS.LHWWA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45

3.41

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

1.03

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.84

+0.25

Drawdowns

HSUS.L vs. HWWA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSUS.L drawdown since its inception was -20.92%, smaller than the maximum HWWA.L drawdown of -25.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSUS.L and HWWA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSUS.LHWWA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.92%

-25.12%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.63%

-6.74%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.92%

-16.79%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-16.79%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-3.53%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.60%

-0.01%

Volatility

HSUS.L vs. HWWA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) is 2.97%, while HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that HSUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWWA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSUS.LHWWA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

3.43%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.45%

7.84%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.46%

10.26%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

12.69%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

14.33%

-0.12%

HSUS.L vs. HWWA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSUS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than HWWA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HSUS.L vs. HWWA.L - Dividend Comparison

HSUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HWWA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSUS.L
HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HWWA.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF
1.29%1.43%1.58%1.95%2.07%1.48%1.45%2.07%2.10%1.86%1.71%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSUS.L and HWWA.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSUS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSUS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HWWA.L.

HSUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HWWA.L is Global Equities. HSUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while HWWA.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for HSUS.L and 0.25% for HWWA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSUS.L and HWWA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer