PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSUS.L vs. CAPU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSUS.L is traded in GBP, while CAPU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CAPU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSUS.L achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than CAPU.L's -1.17% return.


HSUS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
8.60%
YTD
13.96%
6M
14.87%
1Y
35.83%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
14.02%
10Y*

CAPU.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
-1.17%
6M
-0.95%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
9.20%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
14.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSUS.L
HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
13.96%10.79%21.83%15.09%-7.73%29.76%11.33%
CAPU.L
Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust
-1.17%1.73%17.90%21.81%-5.24%29.62%9.74%

Correlation

The correlation between HSUS.L and CAPU.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between HSUS.L and CAPU.L has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSUS.L vs. CAPU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSUS.L
HSUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HSUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

CAPU.L
CAPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CAPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSUS.LCAPU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.12

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.33

0.83

+5.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.41

2.51

+19.90

HSUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is higher than the CAPU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSUS.L and CAPU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSUS.LCAPU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45

0.70

+2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.70

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.89

+0.19

Drawdowns

HSUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSUS.L drawdown since its inception was -20.92%, smaller than the maximum CAPU.L drawdown of -26.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSUS.L and CAPU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSUS.LCAPU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.92%

-26.39%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.63%

-7.76%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.92%

-15.35%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-15.35%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.43%

+5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-3.57%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

2.59%

-1.00%

Volatility

HSUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) have volatilities of 2.97% and 3.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSUS.LCAPU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

3.07%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.45%

7.04%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.46%

9.26%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

13.57%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

15.60%

-1.39%

HSUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSUS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPU.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSUS.L vs. CAPU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HSUS.L nor CAPU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HSUS.L and CAPU.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSUS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSUS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAPU.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for HSUS.L and 0.65% for CAPU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSUS.L and CAPU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer