HSUS.L vs. BBDD.L
HSUS.L (HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) and BBDD.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from HSBC and JPMorgan respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSUS.L returned 14.02%/yr vs 14.49%/yr for BBDD.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HSUS.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BBDD.L.
Performance
HSUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HSUS.L is traded in GBP, while BBDD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BBDD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSUS.L achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than BBDD.L's 10.24% return.
HSUS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 8.60%
- YTD
- 13.96%
- 6M
- 14.87%
- 1Y
- 35.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.59%
- 5Y*
- 14.02%
- 10Y*
- —
BBDD.L
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 5.90%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 28.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- 14.49%
- 10Y*
- —
HSUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSUS.L HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 13.96% | 10.79% | 21.83% | 15.09% | -7.73% | 29.76% | 11.33% |
BBDD.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) | 10.24% | 9.41% | 27.20% | 20.72% | -10.45% | 29.23% | 10.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSUS.L and BBDD.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020 | 0.96 |
The correlation between HSUS.L and BBDD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
HSUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSUS.L
BBDD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
HSUS.L
BBDD.L
Financial Services
HSUS.L
BBDD.L
Healthcare
HSUS.L
BBDD.L
Consumer Cyclical
HSUS.L
BBDD.L
Communication Services
HSUS.L
BBDD.L
Basic Materials
HSUS.L
BBDD.L
Industrials
HSUS.L
BBDD.L
Energy
HSUS.L
BBDD.L
Consumer Defensive
HSUS.L
BBDD.L
Real Estate
HSUS.L
BBDD.L
Utilities
HSUS.L
BBDD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSUS.L vs. BBDD.L — Risk / Return Rank
HSUS.L
BBDD.L
HSUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSUS.L | BBDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.50 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.33 | 3.65 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.41 | 12.75 | +9.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSUS.L | BBDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.45 | 2.69 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 1.00 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.96 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
HSUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSUS.L drawdown since its inception was -20.92%, smaller than the maximum BBDD.L drawdown of -25.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSUS.L and BBDD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSUS.L | BBDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.92% | -25.72% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.63% | -7.78% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.92% | -21.41% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -21.41% | +0.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.22% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -3.73% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 2.23% | -0.64% |
Volatility
HSUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that HSUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBDD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSUS.L | BBDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 2.62% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.45% | 7.24% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.46% | 10.64% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 14.47% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 16.17% | -1.96% |
HSUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSUS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BBDD.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HSUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Dividend Comparison
HSUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBDD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBDD.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.99% | 1.12% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.44% | 0.94% | 1.46% | 0.79% |
HSUS.L HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, HSUS.L and BBDD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BBDD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBDD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for HSUS.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for HSUS.L and 0.05% for BBDD.L.
Find the right allocation for HSUS.L and BBDD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer