PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HSPD.L vs. UC13.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HSPD.L vs. UC13.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HSPD.L (HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and UC13.L (UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis) are both S&P 500 funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, from HSBC and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HSPD.L returned 15.23%/yr vs 13.67%/yr for UC13.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSPD.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for UC13.L.

Performance

HSPD.L vs. UC13.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPD.L) and UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSPD.L is traded in USD, while UC13.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC13.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSPD.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than UC13.L's 9.66% return. Over the past 10 years, HSPD.L has outperformed UC13.L with an annualized return of 15.23%, while UC13.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.67% annualized return.

HSPD.L

1D
0.02%
1M
4.45%
YTD
10.31%
6M
11.11%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
22.18%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*
15.23%

UC13.L

1D
0.03%
1M
4.62%
YTD
9.66%
6M
10.64%
1Y
26.62%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPD.L vs. UC13.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSPD.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF		10.31%17.39%25.26%26.91%-18.83%29.36%17.88%30.46%-5.36%21.64%
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis		9.66%16.57%23.67%24.37%-19.63%28.29%15.23%29.41%-7.09%19.35%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPD.L and UC13.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013

0.91

The correlation between HSPD.L and UC13.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSPD.L vs. UC13.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HSPD.L
UC13.L

Technology

35.6%
37.9%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.3%

Communication Services

11.2%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.8%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.3%

Industrials

8.3%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.8%

Energy

3.5%
3.4%

Utilities

2.3%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.7%

Technology

HSPD.L
35.6%
UC13.L
37.9%

Financial Services

HSPD.L
11.8%
UC13.L
11.3%

Communication Services

HSPD.L
11.2%
UC13.L
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HSPD.L
10.1%
UC13.L
9.8%

Healthcare

HSPD.L
8.5%
UC13.L
8.3%

Industrials

HSPD.L
8.3%
UC13.L
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

HSPD.L
4.9%
UC13.L
4.8%

Energy

HSPD.L
3.5%
UC13.L
3.4%

Utilities

HSPD.L
2.3%
UC13.L
2.2%

Real Estate

HSPD.L
1.9%
UC13.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

HSPD.L
1.8%
UC13.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF

UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis

Often compared with HSPD.L:
HSPD.L vs. HSPX.LHSPD.L vs. CSPX.LHSPD.L vs. HUKX.LHSPD.L vs. HSBCHSPD.L vs. VOOHSPD.L vs. SPYHSPD.L vs. CNDX.L
Often compared with UC13.L:
UC13.L vs. VUSA.LUC13.L vs. CSPX.LUC13.L vs. VOOUC13.L vs. SPXP.LUC13.L vs. SPYUC13.L vs. XDPG.LUC13.L vs. I500.L

Return for Risk

HSPD.L vs. UC13.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HSPD.L
HSPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HSPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
UC13.L
UC13.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UC13.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC13.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC13.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UC13.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC13.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPD.L vs. UC13.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPD.L) and UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HSPD.LUC13.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.39
2.40

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.47
3.47

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.43

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

2.81

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.45

11.87

+2.58

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HSPD.L vs. UC13.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the UC13.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSPD.L and UC13.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HSPD.LUC13.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.40

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.79

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.85

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.80

+0.16

Drawdowns

HSPD.L vs. UC13.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, roughly equal to the maximum UC13.L drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPD.L and UC13.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HSPD.LUC13.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.00%

-33.60%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.24%

-9.42%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-19.27%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.59%

-26.03%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.00%

-33.60%

-0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.55%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-4.24%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.24%

-0.32%

Volatility

HSPD.L vs. UC13.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) at 2.59%. This indicates that HSPD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC13.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HSPD.LUC13.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.59%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

7.91%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

11.05%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.91%

15.72%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

16.23%

0.00%

HSPD.L vs. UC13.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPD.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than UC13.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HSPD.L vs. UC13.L - Dividend Comparison

HSPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than UC13.L's 0.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSPD.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF		0.83%0.90%1.00%1.18%1.34%0.98%1.32%1.41%1.68%1.44%1.65%1.67%
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis		0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.91, HSPD.L and UC13.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UC13.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC13.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for HSPD.L.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for HSPD.L and 0.03% for UC13.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSPD.L and UC13.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer