HSPD.L vs. S5SD.L
HSPD.L (HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and S5SD.L (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis) are both S&P 500 funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, from HSBC and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HSPD.L returned 27.87% vs 28.81% for S5SD.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSPD.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for S5SD.L.
Performance
HSPD.L vs. S5SD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HSPD.L is traded in USD, while S5SD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the S5SD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSPD.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than S5SD.L's 8.70% return.
HSPD.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 27.87%
- 3Y*
- 22.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
S5SD.L
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 28.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSPD.L vs. S5SD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HSPD.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.31% | 26.42% |
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis | 8.70% | 28.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSPD.L and S5SD.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.88 |
The correlation between HSPD.L and S5SD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
HSPD.L vs. S5SD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSPD.L
S5SD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HSPD.L
S5SD.L
Financial Services
HSPD.L
S5SD.L
Communication Services
HSPD.L
S5SD.L
Consumer Cyclical
HSPD.L
S5SD.L
Healthcare
HSPD.L
S5SD.L
Industrials
HSPD.L
S5SD.L
Consumer Defensive
HSPD.L
S5SD.L
Energy
HSPD.L
S5SD.L
Utilities
HSPD.L
S5SD.L
Real Estate
HSPD.L
S5SD.L
Basic Materials
HSPD.L
S5SD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSPD.L vs. S5SD.L — Risk / Return Rank
HSPD.L
S5SD.L
HSPD.L vs. S5SD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPD.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSPD.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.47 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 3.07 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.45 | 13.34 | +1.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSPD.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.65 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 3.04 | -2.08 |
Drawdowns
HSPD.L vs. S5SD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSPD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, which is greater than S5SD.L's maximum drawdown of -9.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPD.L and S5SD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSPD.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.00% | -9.53% | -24.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.24% | -9.53% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -0.80% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.76% | -1.16% | -2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.20% | -0.28% |
Volatility
HSPD.L vs. S5SD.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) at 2.88%. This indicates that HSPD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than S5SD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSPD.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 2.88% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.47% | 8.01% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.59% | 11.10% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 11.60% | +4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 11.60% | +4.63% |
HSPD.L vs. S5SD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSPD.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than S5SD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HSPD.L vs. S5SD.L - Dividend Comparison
HSPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while S5SD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPD.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.83% | 0.90% | 1.00% | 1.18% | 1.34% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 1.41% | 1.68% | 1.44% | 1.65% | 1.67% |
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSPD.L and S5SD.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSPD.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSPD.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for S5SD.L.
Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for HSPD.L and 0.12% for S5SD.L.
Find the right allocation for HSPD.L and S5SD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer