PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSPD.L vs. H50E.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSPD.L vs. H50E.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPD.L) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (H50E.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSPD.L is traded in USD, while H50E.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the H50E.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSPD.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than H50E.L's 6.32% return. Over the past 10 years, HSPD.L has outperformed H50E.L with an annualized return of 15.23%, while H50E.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.80% annualized return.


HSPD.L

1D
0.02%
1M
4.45%
YTD
10.31%
6M
11.11%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
22.18%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*
15.23%

H50E.L

1D
1.02%
1M
4.10%
YTD
6.32%
6M
8.49%
1Y
17.84%
3Y*
18.75%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPD.L vs. H50E.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSPD.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.31%17.39%25.26%26.91%-18.83%29.36%17.88%30.46%-5.36%21.64%
H50E.L
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
6.32%37.68%4.43%26.39%-13.67%14.53%6.47%26.61%-15.59%25.28%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPD.L and H50E.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2010

0.67

The correlation between HSPD.L and H50E.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSPD.L vs. H50E.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSPD.L
H50E.L

Technology

35.6%
17.9%

Financial Services

11.8%
24.8%

Communication Services

11.2%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.7%

Healthcare

8.5%
5.2%

Industrials

8.3%
21.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.4%

Energy

3.5%
5.0%

Utilities

2.3%
4.6%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.5%

Technology

HSPD.L
35.6%
H50E.L
17.9%

Financial Services

HSPD.L
11.8%
H50E.L
24.8%

Communication Services

HSPD.L
11.2%
H50E.L
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HSPD.L
10.1%
H50E.L
9.7%

Healthcare

HSPD.L
8.5%
H50E.L
5.2%

Industrials

HSPD.L
8.3%
H50E.L
21.5%

Consumer Defensive

HSPD.L
4.9%
H50E.L
5.4%

Energy

HSPD.L
3.5%
H50E.L
5.0%

Utilities

HSPD.L
2.3%
H50E.L
4.6%

Real Estate

HSPD.L
1.9%
H50E.L

-

Basic Materials

HSPD.L
1.8%
H50E.L
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSPD.L vs. H50E.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSPD.L
HSPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HSPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

H50E.L
H50E.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
H50E.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H50E.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
H50E.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
H50E.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
H50E.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPD.L vs. H50E.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPD.L) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (H50E.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSPD.LH50E.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.19

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

1.34

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.45

4.59

+9.86

HSPD.L vs. H50E.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the H50E.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSPD.L and H50E.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSPD.LH50E.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.03

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.51

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.53

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.30

+0.66

Drawdowns

HSPD.L vs. H50E.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, smaller than the maximum H50E.L drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPD.L and H50E.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSPD.LH50E.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.00%

-39.20%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.24%

-13.28%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-15.79%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.59%

-35.14%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.00%

-39.20%

+5.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-1.17%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-10.67%

+6.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

3.88%

-1.96%

Volatility

HSPD.L vs. H50E.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPD.L) is 3.23%, while HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (H50E.L) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that HSPD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H50E.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSPD.LH50E.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

5.58%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

14.06%

-5.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

17.19%

-5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.91%

20.54%

-4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

20.64%

-4.41%

HSPD.L vs. H50E.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPD.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than H50E.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HSPD.L vs. H50E.L - Dividend Comparison

HSPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than H50E.L's 2.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H50E.L
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
2.45%2.46%2.98%2.92%2.77%2.01%2.05%3.04%3.50%2.76%2.79%2.63%
HSPD.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.83%0.90%1.00%1.18%1.34%0.98%1.32%1.41%1.68%1.44%1.65%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSPD.L and H50E.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSPD.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSPD.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for H50E.L.

HSPD.L is categorized as S&P 500, while H50E.L is Europe Equities. HSPD.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while H50E.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for HSPD.L and 0.25% for H50E.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSPD.L and H50E.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer