PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSJP.L vs. PAJS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSJP.L vs. PAJS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) and Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSJP.L is traded in GBP, while PAJS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PAJS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSJP.L achieves a 13.21% return, which is significantly higher than PAJS.L's 7.24% return.


HSJP.L

1D
0.17%
1M
8.19%
YTD
13.21%
6M
13.27%
1Y
30.10%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*

PAJS.L

1D
-0.95%
1M
3.55%
YTD
7.24%
6M
5.00%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
6.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSJP.L vs. PAJS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HSJP.L
HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
13.21%18.24%13.93%13.26%-5.31%-2.93%
PAJS.L
Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
7.24%13.24%0.76%8.67%-14.19%-3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between HSJP.L and PAJS.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.88

The correlation between HSJP.L and PAJS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSJP.L vs. PAJS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSJP.L
HSJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
HSJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

PAJS.L
PAJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSJP.L vs. PAJS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) and Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSJP.LPAJS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.20

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

1.62

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

5.02

+2.33

HSJP.L vs. PAJS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSJP.L and PAJS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSJP.LPAJS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.07

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.10

+0.64

Drawdowns

HSJP.L vs. PAJS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSJP.L drawdown since its inception was -16.22%, smaller than the maximum PAJS.L drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSJP.L and PAJS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSJP.LPAJS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.22%

-29.71%

+13.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-11.92%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.09%

-29.71%

+16.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-7.43%

+7.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-16.45%

+11.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

3.84%

+0.24%

Volatility

HSJP.L vs. PAJS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) is 3.87%, while Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that HSJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAJS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSJP.LPAJS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

4.40%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.21%

14.33%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.66%

18.01%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

22.26%

-6.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

22.26%

-6.34%

HSJP.L vs. PAJS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSJP.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PAJS.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HSJP.L vs. PAJS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HSJP.L nor PAJS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HSJP.L and PAJS.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSJP.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSJP.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for PAJS.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HSJP.L and 0.19% for PAJS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSJP.L and PAJS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer