HSJP.L vs. LGJP.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HSJP.L (HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) and LGJP.L (L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - HSJP.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY while LGJP.L tracks the L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSJP.L returned 11.19%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for LGJP.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSJP.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGJP.L.

Performance

HSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HSJP.L is traded in GBP, while LGJP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LGJP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSJP.L achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly lower than LGJP.L's 15.40% return.

HSJP.L

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 7.29%
• YTD: 13.58%
• 1Y: 34.61%
• 3Y*: 18.25%
• 5Y*: 11.19%
• 10Y*: —

LGJP.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.59%
• 6M: 9.38%
• YTD: 15.40%
• 1Y: 33.41%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 10.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HSJP.L HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD	13.58%	18.26%	13.86%	13.29%	-5.31%	4.55%	-10.63%
LGJP.L L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF	15.40%	16.72%	10.25%	14.24%	-6.86%	2.01%	11.13%

Correlation

The correlation between HSJP.L and LGJP.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.91

The correlation between HSJP.L and LGJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HSJP.L vs. LGJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSJP.L

HSJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
HSJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
HSJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
HSJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
HSJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
HSJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

LGJP.L

LGJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
LGJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LGJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LGJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
LGJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSJP.L	LGJP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.66	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.33	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.31	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	3.08	-0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.46	9.53	-1.07

HSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSJP.L and LGJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSJP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, which is greater than LGJP.L's maximum drawdown of -23.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSJP.L and LGJP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSJP.L	LGJP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.60%	-23.10%	-2.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.12%	-10.76%	-1.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.24%	-13.79%	-6.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.24%	-18.15%	-2.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.57%	-4.57%	+2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.89%	-4.98%	-3.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.08%	3.49%	+0.59%

Volatility

HSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) is 5.39%, while L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that HSJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSJP.L	LGJP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	6.43%	-1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.61%	16.88%	-1.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.20%	19.99%	-0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.29%	16.80%	+4.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.13%	17.43%	+4.70%

HSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSJP.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than LGJP.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HSJP.L nor LGJP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSJP.L and LGJP.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, HSJP.L and LGJP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, HSJP.L or LGJP.L?

On fees, LGJP.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSJP.L or LGJP.L?

LGJP.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HSJP.L.

What is the main difference between HSJP.L and LGJP.L?

HSJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while LGJP.L tracks L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HSJP.L and 0.10% for LGJP.L.