HSJP.L vs. HWWA.L
HSJP.L (HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) and HWWA.L (HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while HWWA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSJP.L returned 11.11%/yr vs 12.99%/yr for HWWA.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HSJP.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HWWA.L.
Performance
HSJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HSJP.L having a 13.21% return and HWWA.L slightly higher at 13.69%.
HSJP.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 8.19%
- YTD
- 13.21%
- 6M
- 13.27%
- 1Y
- 30.10%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- —
HWWA.L
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 6M
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 34.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.22%
HSJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSJP.L HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 13.21% | 18.24% | 13.93% | 13.26% | -5.31% | 4.55% | 14.34% |
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 13.69% | 16.74% | 17.83% | 15.71% | -7.83% | 21.70% | 11.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSJP.L and HWWA.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between HSJP.L and HWWA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
HSJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSJP.L
HWWA.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Financial Services
HSJP.L
HWWA.L
Industrials
HSJP.L
HWWA.L
Technology
HSJP.L
HWWA.L
Consumer Cyclical
HSJP.L
HWWA.L
Communication Services
HSJP.L
HWWA.L
Healthcare
HSJP.L
HWWA.L
Consumer Defensive
HSJP.L
HWWA.L
Real Estate
HSJP.L
HWWA.L
Basic Materials
HSJP.L
HWWA.L
Energy
HSJP.L
HWWA.L
Utilities
HSJP.L
HWWA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSJP.L vs. HWWA.L — Risk / Return Rank
HSJP.L
HWWA.L
HSJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) and HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSJP.L | HWWA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.64 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 5.06 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.35 | 21.35 | -14.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSJP.L | HWWA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 3.34 | -1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.02 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.83 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
HSJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSJP.L drawdown since its inception was -16.22%, smaller than the maximum HWWA.L drawdown of -25.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSJP.L and HWWA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSJP.L | HWWA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.22% | -25.12% | +8.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.15% | -6.74% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.09% | -16.79% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.22% | -16.79% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.35% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -3.53% | -1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 1.60% | +2.48% |
Volatility
HSJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) at 3.48%. This indicates that HSJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWWA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSJP.L | HWWA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 3.48% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.21% | 7.85% | +7.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.66% | 10.23% | +8.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 12.69% | +3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 14.32% | +1.60% |
HSJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSJP.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HWWA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HSJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Dividend Comparison
HSJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HWWA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSJP.L HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 1.29% | 1.43% | 1.58% | 1.95% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 1.45% | 2.07% | 2.10% | 1.86% | 1.71% | 1.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSJP.L and HWWA.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSJP.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSJP.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HWWA.L.
HSJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while HWWA.L is Global Equities. HSJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while HWWA.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HSJP.L and 0.25% for HWWA.L.
Find the right allocation for HSJP.L and HWWA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer