PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSJP.L vs. HMWO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSJP.L vs. HMWO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSJP.L is traded in GBP, while HMWO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HMWO.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSJP.L achieves a 13.21% return, which is significantly higher than HMWO.L's 9.53% return.


HSJP.L

1D
0.17%
1M
8.19%
YTD
13.21%
6M
13.27%
1Y
30.10%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*

HMWO.L

1D
0.16%
1M
5.13%
YTD
9.53%
6M
9.79%
1Y
25.75%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSJP.L vs. HMWO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSJP.L
HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
13.21%18.24%13.93%13.26%-5.31%4.55%14.34%
HMWO.L
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF
9.53%11.10%19.31%15.79%-10.00%22.25%10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HSJP.L and HMWO.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020

0.61

The correlation between HSJP.L and HMWO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSJP.L vs. HMWO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSJP.L
HMWO.L

Financial Services

20.9%
15.4%

Industrials

19.9%
11.0%

Technology

19.0%
30.2%

Consumer Cyclical

17.3%
9.0%

Communication Services

9.6%
9.1%

Healthcare

5.5%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
5.2%

Real Estate

2.3%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.0%
3.2%

Energy

0.1%
4.1%

Utilities

0.0%
2.5%

Financial Services

HSJP.L
20.9%
HMWO.L
15.4%

Industrials

HSJP.L
19.9%
HMWO.L
11.0%

Technology

HSJP.L
19.0%
HMWO.L
30.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HSJP.L
17.3%
HMWO.L
9.0%

Communication Services

HSJP.L
9.6%
HMWO.L
9.1%

Healthcare

HSJP.L
5.5%
HMWO.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

HSJP.L
4.3%
HMWO.L
5.2%

Real Estate

HSJP.L
2.3%
HMWO.L
1.8%

Basic Materials

HSJP.L
1.0%
HMWO.L
3.2%

Energy

HSJP.L
0.1%
HMWO.L
4.1%

Utilities

HSJP.L
0.0%
HMWO.L
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSJP.L vs. HMWO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSJP.L
HSJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
HSJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

HMWO.L
HMWO.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HMWO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMWO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMWO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HMWO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMWO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSJP.L vs. HMWO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSJP.LHMWO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.47

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.82

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

15.06

-7.70

HSJP.L vs. HMWO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the HMWO.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSJP.L and HMWO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSJP.LHMWO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.50

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.86

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.72

+0.03

Drawdowns

HSJP.L vs. HMWO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSJP.L drawdown since its inception was -16.22%, smaller than the maximum HMWO.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSJP.L and HMWO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSJP.LHMWO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.22%

-25.48%

+9.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-6.71%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.09%

-19.01%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.22%

-19.01%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.13%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-4.07%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

1.71%

+2.37%

Volatility

HSJP.L vs. HMWO.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L) at 2.54%. This indicates that HSJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMWO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSJP.LHMWO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

2.54%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.21%

7.34%

+7.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.66%

10.26%

+8.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

13.28%

+2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

14.47%

+1.45%

HSJP.L vs. HMWO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSJP.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than HMWO.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HSJP.L vs. HMWO.L - Dividend Comparison

HSJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMWO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMWO.L
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF
0.01%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%
HSJP.L
HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSJP.L and HMWO.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HMWO.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMWO.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HSJP.L.

HSJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while HMWO.L is Global Equities. HSJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while HMWO.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HSJP.L and 0.15% for HMWO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSJP.L and HMWO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer