PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSJP.L vs. CJPU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSJP.L is traded in GBP, while CJPU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CJPU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSJP.L achieves a 10.89% return, which is significantly lower than CJPU.L's 12.60% return.


HSJP.L

1D
-1.75%
1M
-3.54%
6M
3.93%
YTD
10.89%
1Y
30.22%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*

CJPU.L

1D
-2.34%
1M
-6.86%
6M
5.58%
YTD
12.60%
1Y
30.09%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
8.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSJP.L
HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
10.89%18.26%13.86%13.29%-5.31%4.55%-10.63%
CJPU.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.60%17.14%9.20%14.24%-7.49%1.45%11.06%

Correlation

The correlation between HSJP.L and CJPU.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.91

The correlation between HSJP.L and CJPU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSJP.L vs. CJPU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSJP.L
HSJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HSJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CJPU.L
CJPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CJPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSJP.LCJPU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.84

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

8.61

-1.25

HSJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the CJPU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSJP.L and CJPU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSJP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, roughly equal to the maximum CJPU.L drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSJP.L and CJPU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSJP.LCJPU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.60%

-24.62%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-10.54%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.24%

-14.29%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.24%

-18.51%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.88%

-8.44%

+3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.88%

-6.35%

-2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

3.49%

+0.61%

Volatility

HSJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSJP.L) is 5.24%, while iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that HSJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CJPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSJP.LCJPU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

6.83%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.70%

17.53%

-1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.27%

20.79%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.30%

17.07%

+4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

16.77%

+5.36%

HSJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSJP.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CJPU.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HSJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HSJP.L nor CJPU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, HSJP.L and CJPU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CJPU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CJPU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HSJP.L.

HSJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while CJPU.L tracks MSCI Japan Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HSJP.L and 0.12% for CJPU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSJP.L and CJPU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer