PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSJD.L vs. PRIJ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSJD.L vs. PRIJ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC Japan Screened Equity UCITS ETF (HSJD.L) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSJD.L is traded in USD, while PRIJ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRIJ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSJD.L achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly lower than PRIJ.L's 16.14% return.


HSJD.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.36%
6M
6.81%
YTD
13.03%
1Y
34.57%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
10.56%
10Y*

PRIJ.L

1D
-0.67%
1M
0.57%
6M
10.41%
YTD
16.14%
1Y
35.61%
3Y*
18.07%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSJD.L vs. PRIJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSJD.L
HSBC Japan Screened Equity UCITS ETF
13.03%26.99%12.16%19.62%-15.38%3.24%22.05%
PRIJ.L
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
16.14%26.69%7.20%19.78%-16.36%1.56%20.69%

Correlation

The correlation between HSJD.L and PRIJ.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.92

The correlation between HSJD.L and PRIJ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSJD.L vs. PRIJ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSJD.L
HSJD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
HSJD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSJD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSJD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
HSJD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSJD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PRIJ.L
PRIJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PRIJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSJD.L vs. PRIJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Japan Screened Equity UCITS ETF (HSJD.L) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSJD.LPRIJ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

2.70

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.22

8.87

-1.66

HSJD.L vs. PRIJ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSJD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the PRIJ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSJD.L and PRIJ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSJD.L vs. PRIJ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSJD.L drawdown since its inception was -30.50%, smaller than the maximum PRIJ.L drawdown of -32.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSJD.L and PRIJ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSJD.LPRIJ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.50%

-32.13%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.22%

-13.14%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.22%

-13.37%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.50%

-32.13%

+1.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-2.16%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-7.80%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

4.00%

+0.76%

Volatility

HSJD.L vs. PRIJ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Japan Screened Equity UCITS ETF (HSJD.L) is 5.22%, while Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that HSJD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRIJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSJD.LPRIJ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

5.80%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.25%

16.89%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.97%

20.76%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.40%

17.94%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

18.39%

-0.48%

HSJD.L vs. PRIJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSJD.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIJ.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HSJD.L vs. PRIJ.L - Dividend Comparison

HSJD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRIJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HSJD.L
HSBC Japan Screened Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRIJ.L
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.53%1.76%1.89%1.89%2.17%1.81%1.71%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, HSJD.L and PRIJ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PRIJ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIJ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HSJD.L.

HSJD.L tracks HSBC Japan Screened Equity UCITS ETF, while PRIJ.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HSJD.L and 0.05% for PRIJ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSJD.L and PRIJ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer