HSH.TO vs. XUS-U.TO
HSH.TO (Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF) and XUS-U.TO (iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF) are both S&P 500 funds. HSH.TO is actively managed, while XUS-U.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSH.TO returned 11.71%/yr vs 15.35%/yr for XUS-U.TO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
HSH.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HSH.TO is traded in CAD, while XUS-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUS-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSH.TO achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly lower than XUS-U.TO's 13.28% return.
HSH.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 19.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- —
XUS-U.TO
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- YTD
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 22.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- —
HSH.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSH.TO Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF | 9.63% | 15.34% | 23.32% | 25.56% | -19.90% | 28.94% | 16.14% | 8.23% |
XUS-U.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF | 13.28% | 12.68% | 35.30% | 23.54% | -13.58% | 27.66% | 15.58% | 6.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSH.TO and XUS-U.TO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between HSH.TO and XUS-U.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSH.TO vs. XUS-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HSH.TO
XUS-U.TO
HSH.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF (HSH.TO) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSH.TO | XUS-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.71 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | 10.45 | -1.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSH.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSH.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.19%, which is greater than XUS-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSH.TO and XUS-U.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSH.TO | XUS-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.19% | -27.50% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -9.21% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.04% | -19.42% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -23.19% | -2.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.89% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -4.60% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 2.39% | -0.16% |
Volatility
HSH.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF (HSH.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) at 3.47%. This indicates that HSH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUS-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSH.TO | XUS-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 3.47% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 10.38% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 12.84% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 17.61% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.11% | 19.76% | +0.35% |
Dividends
HSH.TO vs. XUS-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
HSH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUS-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSH.TO Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUS-U.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF | 1.14% | 1.25% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.38% | 0.89% | 1.20% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSH.TO and XUS-U.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares.
Find the right allocation for HSH.TO and XUS-U.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer