HSEU.L vs. LCPE.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HSEU.L (HSBC Europe Screened Equity UCITS ETF) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - HSEU.L tracks the HSBC Europe Screened Equity UCITS ETF while LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSEU.L returned 10.23%/yr vs 8.83%/yr for LCPE.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSEU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.

Performance

HSEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC Europe Screened Equity UCITS ETF (HSEU.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HSEU.L is traded in EUR, while LCPE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LCPE.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSEU.L achieves a 14.74% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 16.51% return.

HSEU.L

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.77%
• 6M: 11.27%
• YTD: 14.74%
• 1Y: 26.09%
• 3Y*: 15.85%
• 5Y*: 10.23%
• 10Y*: —

LCPE.L

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 1.12%
• 6M: 13.69%
• YTD: 16.51%
• 1Y: 29.05%
• 3Y*: 11.61%
• 5Y*: 8.83%
• 10Y*: 8.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HSEU.L HSBC Europe Screened Equity UCITS ETF	14.74%	18.95%	9.59%	15.27%	-11.04%	18.74%	9.08%
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS	16.51%	12.10%	2.38%	12.80%	-5.31%	25.16%	9.69%

Correlation

The correlation between HSEU.L and LCPE.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between HSEU.L and LCPE.L has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

HSEU.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSEU.L

HSEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
HSEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
HSEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
HSEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
HSEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
HSEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

LCPE.L

LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Europe Screened Equity UCITS ETF (HSEU.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSEU.L	LCPE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.44	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	3.39	-0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.44	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	5.17	-2.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.67	16.37	-6.70

HSEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSEU.L and LCPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HSEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSEU.L drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, smaller than the maximum LCPE.L drawdown of -32.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSEU.L and LCPE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSEU.L	LCPE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.47%	-32.82%	+11.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.48%	-5.38%	-5.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.61%	-14.38%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.47%	-15.30%	-6.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.10%	-1.52%	-0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.94%	-4.95%	+1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	1.70%	+1.05%

Volatility

HSEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Europe Screened Equity UCITS ETF (HSEU.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) have volatilities of 3.76% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSEU.L	LCPE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	3.83%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.83%	8.75%	+3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.86%	11.43%	+2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.49%	13.27%	+1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.71%	14.59%	+0.12%

HSEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSEU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HSEU.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSEU.L and LCPE.L in my portfolio?

HSEU.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HSEU.L or LCPE.L?

On fees, HSEU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSEU.L or LCPE.L?

HSEU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

What is the main difference between HSEU.L and LCPE.L?

HSEU.L tracks HSBC Europe Screened Equity UCITS ETF, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for HSEU.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.