HSBH vs. SPCZ
HSBH (HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF) and SPCZ (RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. HSBH is passively managed, while SPCZ is actively managed. Over the past year, HSBH returned 60.04% vs 5.04% for SPCZ. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. HSBH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SPCZ.
Performance
HSBH vs. SPCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSBH achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly higher than SPCZ's 1.72% return.
HSBH
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 19.58%
- 6M
- 30.69%
- 1Y
- 60.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPCZ
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 5.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSBH vs. SPCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HSBH HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF | 19.58% | 40.02% |
SPCZ RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF | 1.72% | 7.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSBH and SPCZ is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025 | -0.05 |
HSBH vs. SPCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSBH
SPCZ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
HSBH
SPCZ
Basic Materials
HSBH
-
SPCZ
Communication Services
HSBH
-
SPCZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
HSBH
-
SPCZ
-
Consumer Defensive
HSBH
-
SPCZ
-
Energy
HSBH
-
SPCZ
-
Healthcare
HSBH
-
SPCZ
-
Industrials
HSBH
-
SPCZ
-
Real Estate
HSBH
-
SPCZ
-
Technology
HSBH
-
SPCZ
Utilities
HSBH
-
SPCZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSBH vs. SPCZ — Risk / Return Rank
HSBH
SPCZ
HSBH vs. SPCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) and RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSBH | SPCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.18 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 1.32 | +2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.96 | 3.16 | +11.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSBH | SPCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 0.65 | +1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.62 | 1.15 | +1.47 |
Drawdowns
HSBH vs. SPCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSBH drawdown since its inception was -14.81%, which is greater than SPCZ's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSBH and SPCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSBH | SPCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -4.47% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.81% | -3.82% | -10.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -1.34% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -0.51% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 1.60% | +2.42% |
Volatility
HSBH vs. SPCZ - Volatility Comparison
HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ) at 0.72%. This indicates that HSBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSBH | SPCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 0.72% | +5.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.58% | 6.30% | +12.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.83% | 7.78% | +15.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 5.59% | +16.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 5.59% | +16.84% |
HSBH vs. SPCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSBH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SPCZ's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSBH vs. SPCZ - Dividend Comparison
HSBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than SPCZ's 11.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSBH HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPCZ RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF | 11.85% | 12.06% | 4.24% | 5.01% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSBH and SPCZ have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSBH has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to SPCZ (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSBH dropped -14.81% vs SPCZ's -4.47%.
On 1-year performance, HSBH leads with 60.04% vs 5.04% for SPCZ. On fees, HSBH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SPCZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HSBH has performed better with a 60.04% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HSBH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPCZ.
SPCZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.85%, compared with 0.34% for HSBH.
They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HSBH and 0.90% for SPCZ.
HSBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSBH and SPCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer