PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSBH vs. SPCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSBH vs. SPCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) and RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSBH achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly higher than SPCZ's 1.72% return.


HSBH

1D
-1.17%
1M
1.73%
YTD
19.58%
6M
30.69%
1Y
60.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPCZ

1D
0.35%
1M
0.87%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.81%
1Y
5.04%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSBH vs. SPCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HSBH and SPCZ is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025

-0.05

HSBH vs. SPCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSBH
SPCZ

Financial Services

100.0%
81.4%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.4%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

HSBH
100.0%
SPCZ
81.4%

Basic Materials

HSBH

-

SPCZ
0.0%

Communication Services

HSBH

-

SPCZ

-

Consumer Cyclical

HSBH

-

SPCZ

-

Consumer Defensive

HSBH

-

SPCZ

-

Energy

HSBH

-

SPCZ

-

Healthcare

HSBH

-

SPCZ

-

Industrials

HSBH

-

SPCZ

-

Real Estate

HSBH

-

SPCZ

-

Technology

HSBH

-

SPCZ
0.4%

Utilities

HSBH

-

SPCZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSBH vs. SPCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSBH
HSBH Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
HSBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSBH Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HSBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSBH Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SPCZ
SPCZ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SPCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SPCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSBH vs. SPCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) and RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSBHSPCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.18

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

1.32

+2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.96

3.16

+11.80

HSBH vs. SPCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSBH Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the SPCZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSBH and SPCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSBHSPCZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

0.65

+1.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.62

1.15

+1.47

Drawdowns

HSBH vs. SPCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSBH drawdown since its inception was -14.81%, which is greater than SPCZ's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSBH and SPCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSBHSPCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.81%

-4.47%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.81%

-3.82%

-10.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-1.34%

-2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-0.51%

-1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

1.60%

+2.42%

Volatility

HSBH vs. SPCZ - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ) at 0.72%. This indicates that HSBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSBHSPCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

0.72%

+5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.58%

6.30%

+12.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.83%

7.78%

+15.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.43%

5.59%

+16.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

5.59%

+16.84%

HSBH vs. SPCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSBH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SPCZ's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSBH vs. SPCZ - Dividend Comparison

HSBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than SPCZ's 11.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HSBH
HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF
0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPCZ
RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF
11.85%12.06%4.24%5.01%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSBH and SPCZ have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HSBH has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to SPCZ (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSBH dropped -14.81% vs SPCZ's -4.47%.

On 1-year performance, HSBH leads with 60.04% vs 5.04% for SPCZ. On fees, HSBH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SPCZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HSBH has performed better with a 60.04% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HSBH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPCZ.

SPCZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.85%, compared with 0.34% for HSBH.

They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HSBH and 0.90% for SPCZ.

HSBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSBH and SPCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer