HSAV.TO vs. HCON.TO
HSAV.TO (Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF) and HCON.TO (Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSAV.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X, while HCON.TO is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSAV.TO returned 3.18%/yr vs 4.95%/yr for HCON.TO. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSAV.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for HCON.TO.
Performance
HSAV.TO vs. HCON.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSAV.TO achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than HCON.TO's 5.55% return.
HSAV.TO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 2.44%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- —
HCON.TO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- 13.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- —
HSAV.TO vs. HCON.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSAV.TO Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF | 0.94% | 2.58% | 4.24% | 5.04% | 2.79% | 0.66% | 0.71% |
HCON.TO Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF | 5.55% | 10.11% | 12.67% | 11.86% | -16.79% | 9.57% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSAV.TO and HCON.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2020 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSAV.TO vs. HCON.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HSAV.TO
HCON.TO
HSAV.TO vs. HCON.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) and Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF (HCON.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSAV.TO | HCON.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.41 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 2.94 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.94 | 11.17 | -0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSAV.TO vs. HCON.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSAV.TO drawdown since its inception was -2.18%, smaller than the maximum HCON.TO drawdown of -22.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSAV.TO and HCON.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSAV.TO | HCON.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -22.98% | +20.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.59% | -4.71% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.06% | -6.10% | +5.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.18% | -20.12% | +17.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.39% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.19% | -4.29% | +4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | 1.24% | -1.02% |
Volatility
HSAV.TO vs. HCON.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) is 0.35%, while Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF (HCON.TO) has a volatility of 2.42%. This indicates that HSAV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCON.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSAV.TO | HCON.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | 2.42% | -2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.02% | 5.72% | -4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39% | 6.97% | -5.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 8.84% | -7.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.57% | 11.64% | -10.07% |
HSAV.TO vs. HCON.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSAV.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HCON.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HSAV.TO vs. HCON.TO - Dividend Comparison
HSAV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HCON.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCON.TO Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF | 2.72% | 2.83% | 2.60% | 1.19% | 0.02% | 0.09% | 0.78% | 0.03% |
HSAV.TO Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSAV.TO and HCON.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSAV.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSAV.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for HCON.TO.
HSAV.TO is categorized as Money Market, while HCON.TO is Global Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HSAV.TO and 0.22% for HCON.TO.
Find the right allocation for HSAV.TO and HCON.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer