PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRSCX vs. CWFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HRSCX vs. CWFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund (HRSCX) and Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRSCX achieves a 18.00% return, which is significantly higher than CWFIX's 1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, HRSCX has outperformed CWFIX with an annualized return of 9.25%, while CWFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.01% annualized return.


HRSCX

1D
-0.52%
1M
4.06%
YTD
18.00%
6M
18.33%
1Y
38.23%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
9.25%

CWFIX

1D
0.01%
1M
0.53%
YTD
1.50%
6M
2.04%
1Y
5.71%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
3.94%
10Y*
4.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRSCX vs. CWFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HRSCX
Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund
18.00%11.26%12.85%14.06%-27.67%0.80%37.26%25.40%-10.92%22.88%
CWFIX
Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund
1.50%6.99%5.78%7.80%-3.17%2.40%4.38%7.33%0.36%3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between HRSCX and CWFIX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2014

0.39

The correlation between HRSCX and CWFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRSCX vs. CWFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRSCX
HRSCX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HRSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
HRSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

CWFIX
CWFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CWFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CWFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRSCX vs. CWFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund (HRSCX) and Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HRSCXCWFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

3.85

-1.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

6.37

-3.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

2.08

-0.75

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

5.07

-1.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.18

27.40

-14.22

HRSCX vs. CWFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is lower than the CWFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRSCX and CWFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HRSCXCWFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

3.85

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

1.43

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

1.30

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

1.12

-0.70

Drawdowns

HRSCX vs. CWFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRSCX drawdown since its inception was -55.68%, which is greater than CWFIX's maximum drawdown of -12.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRSCX and CWFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRSCXCWFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.68%

-12.41%

-43.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-1.13%

-11.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.37%

-1.37%

-27.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.22%

-6.36%

-31.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.32%

-12.41%

-25.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

0.00%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.50%

-0.86%

-10.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

0.21%

+2.72%

Volatility

HRSCX vs. CWFIX - Volatility Comparison

Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund (HRSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX) at 0.42%. This indicates that HRSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRSCXCWFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

0.42%

+5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.36%

1.20%

+14.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.77%

1.50%

+18.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.61%

2.76%

+20.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.97%

3.09%

+20.88%

HRSCX vs. CWFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRSCX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than CWFIX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HRSCX vs. CWFIX - Dividend Comparison

HRSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, more than CWFIX's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWFIX
Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund
5.15%5.17%5.09%4.41%3.17%2.79%3.38%3.60%3.24%2.82%3.79%3.32%
HRSCX
Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund
7.14%8.42%22.56%9.37%38.95%40.00%18.51%6.62%26.17%8.10%0.06%7.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


HRSCX and CWFIX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRSCX has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to CWFIX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRSCX dropped -55.68% vs CWFIX's -12.41%.

CWFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.85 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRSCX and CWFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer