PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRCVX vs. SUBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HRCVX vs. SUBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Eagle Growth & Income Fund (HRCVX) and Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRCVX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than SUBFX's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, HRCVX has outperformed SUBFX with an annualized return of 11.23%, while SUBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.93% annualized return.


HRCVX

1D
1.20%
1M
3.60%
YTD
10.11%
6M
9.53%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
11.23%

SUBFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
0.79%
6M
0.54%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
3.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRCVX vs. SUBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HRCVX
Carillon Eagle Growth & Income Fund
10.11%12.69%15.43%9.32%-9.97%27.28%6.30%22.16%-1.95%20.13%
SUBFX
Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund
0.79%10.61%4.22%8.53%-4.74%-0.32%11.18%6.52%0.53%2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between HRCVX and SUBFX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2011

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRCVX vs. SUBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRCVX
HRCVX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HRCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
HRCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SUBFX
SUBFX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SUBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SUBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRCVX vs. SUBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Eagle Growth & Income Fund (HRCVX) and Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HRCVXSUBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.63

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.67

10.16

+3.51

HRCVX vs. SUBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the SUBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRCVX and SUBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HRCVXSUBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

1.80

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.65

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.75

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.95

-0.35

Drawdowns

HRCVX vs. SUBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRCVX drawdown since its inception was -52.16%, which is greater than SUBFX's maximum drawdown of -11.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRCVX and SUBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRCVXSUBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.16%

-11.22%

-40.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-2.34%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

-4.88%

-11.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.00%

-11.17%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.93%

-11.22%

-22.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.04%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-1.46%

-5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

0.60%

+1.18%

Volatility

HRCVX vs. SUBFX - Volatility Comparison

Carillon Eagle Growth & Income Fund (HRCVX) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX) at 1.51%. This indicates that HRCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRCVXSUBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

1.51%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.96%

2.78%

+5.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.45%

3.42%

+7.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.07%

5.49%

+8.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

5.29%

+10.58%

HRCVX vs. SUBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRCVX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than SUBFX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HRCVX vs. SUBFX - Dividend Comparison

HRCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.99%, more than SUBFX's 6.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRCVX
Carillon Eagle Growth & Income Fund
17.99%19.67%17.03%13.29%7.37%9.36%4.99%4.81%10.18%4.01%6.56%1.67%
SUBFX
Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund
6.06%6.44%4.92%4.52%2.16%1.96%3.01%2.83%2.06%1.17%1.01%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


HRCVX and SUBFX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRCVX has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to SUBFX (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRCVX dropped -52.16% vs SUBFX's -11.22%.

HRCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRCVX and SUBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer