PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HQU.TO vs. 3XLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HQU.TO vs. 3XLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HQU.TO vs. 3XLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF
-19.26%26.77%40.01%114.00%-61.73%5.71%
3XLE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP
156.44%-15.58%-6.73%-27.25%176.45%-2.04%
Different Trading Currencies

HQU.TO is traded in CAD, while 3XLE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3XLE.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQU.TO achieves a -19.26% return, which is significantly lower than 3XLE.L's 156.44% return.


HQU.TO

1D
-1.54%
1M
-16.22%
YTD
-19.26%
6M
-17.81%
1Y
25.75%
3Y*
29.55%
5Y*
12.05%
10Y*
25.93%

3XLE.L

1D
-1.62%
1M
46.96%
YTD
156.44%
6M
150.57%
1Y
70.19%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HQU.TO vs. 3XLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

HQU.TO vs. 3XLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQU.TO
HQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

3XLE.L
3XLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
3XLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQU.TO vs. 3XLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HQU.TO3XLE.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.58

1.02

-0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

1.53

-0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.22

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.37

-0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.41

2.23

+0.18

HQU.TO vs. 3XLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the 3XLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQU.TO and 3XLE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HQU.TO3XLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

1.02

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.50

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between HQU.TO and 3XLE.L is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HQU.TO vs. 3XLE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HQU.TO nor 3XLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

HQU.TO vs. 3XLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.76%, which is greater than 3XLE.L's maximum drawdown of -71.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQU.TO and 3XLE.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HQU.TO3XLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.76%

-74.89%

-20.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.85%

-51.60%

+25.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.85%

-11.27%

-14.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.80%

-45.52%

-10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.85%

32.36%

-24.51%

Volatility

HQU.TO vs. 3XLE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) is 11.02%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) has a volatility of 19.62%. This indicates that HQU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3XLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HQU.TO3XLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.02%

19.62%

-8.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.66%

42.03%

-17.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.35%

68.90%

-24.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.83%

80.65%

-35.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.72%

80.65%

-35.93%