PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HQIIX vs. FDGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HQIIX vs. FDGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Equity Income Fund Class I (HQIIX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQIIX achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly lower than FDGFX's 16.94% return. Over the past 10 years, HQIIX has underperformed FDGFX with an annualized return of 11.59%, while FDGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.


HQIIX

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.77%
YTD
5.89%
6M
6.60%
1Y
17.28%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
11.59%

FDGFX

1D
-0.48%
1M
3.42%
YTD
16.94%
6M
17.86%
1Y
38.26%
3Y*
27.23%
5Y*
15.77%
10Y*
14.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HQIIX vs. FDGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HQIIX
Hartford Equity Income Fund Class I
5.89%15.20%10.08%7.28%-0.31%25.54%4.59%35.14%-7.86%17.81%
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
16.94%22.48%27.58%17.86%-11.61%27.96%2.20%28.75%-7.23%18.05%

Correlation

The correlation between HQIIX and FDGFX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2006

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between HQIIX and FDGFX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HQIIX vs. FDGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQIIX
HQIIX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
HQIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
HQIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FDGFX
FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQIIX vs. FDGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Equity Income Fund Class I (HQIIX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HQIIXFDGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.51

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.80

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

17.07

-8.61

HQIIX vs. FDGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the FDGFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQIIX and FDGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HQIIXFDGFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.86

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.96

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.74

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.53

-0.01

Drawdowns

HQIIX vs. FDGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQIIX drawdown since its inception was -50.60%, smaller than the maximum FDGFX drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQIIX and FDGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HQIIXFDGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.60%

-60.77%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-10.16%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.84%

-21.37%

+9.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.98%

-21.37%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.99%

-41.29%

+6.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.56%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-7.52%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.26%

-0.24%

Volatility

HQIIX vs. FDGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Equity Income Fund Class I (HQIIX) is 2.51%, while Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that HQIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HQIIXFDGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

4.08%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.48%

10.58%

-3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

13.49%

-3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

16.59%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

19.21%

-3.00%

HQIIX vs. FDGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HQIIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FDGFX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

HQIIX vs. FDGFX - Dividend Comparison

HQIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.83%, more than FDGFX's 8.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
8.16%9.35%9.81%3.48%11.46%7.81%1.89%4.84%22.93%15.35%1.58%8.44%
HQIIX
Hartford Equity Income Fund Class I
12.83%13.51%10.71%7.87%13.14%9.10%2.94%14.91%11.01%7.01%5.26%10.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


HQIIX and FDGFX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDGFX has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to HQIIX (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HQIIX dropped -50.60% vs FDGFX's -60.77%.

FDGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HQIIX and FDGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer