PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HQIFX vs. FLCCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HQIFX vs. FLCCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Equity Income Fund Class F (HQIFX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HQIFX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.78%
YTD
6.01%
6M
6.61%
1Y
17.28%
3Y*
13.00%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*

FLCCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
11.54%
3Y*
18.09%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HQIFX vs. FLCCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HQIFX
Hartford Equity Income Fund Class F
6.01%14.73%9.32%7.39%-0.21%25.65%4.68%35.35%-7.83%12.85%
FLCCX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C
0.00%18.58%25.08%22.21%-8.85%24.54%7.70%30.36%-9.25%11.28%

Correlation

The correlation between HQIFX and FLCCX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between HQIFX and FLCCX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HQIFX vs. FLCCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQIFX
HQIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
HQIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
HQIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCCX
FLCCX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FLCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQIFX vs. FLCCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Equity Income Fund Class F (HQIFX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HQIFXFLCCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.73

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

4.65

+3.68

HQIFX vs. FLCCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the FLCCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQIFX and FLCCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HQIFXFLCCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.73

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.71

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.43

+0.24

Drawdowns

HQIFX vs. FLCCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQIFX drawdown since its inception was -34.99%, smaller than the maximum FLCCX drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQIFX and FLCCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HQIFXFLCCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.99%

-65.81%

+30.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.69%

-5.10%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-19.06%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.93%

-22.04%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-4.23%

+3.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-15.48%

+11.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.82%

-0.67%

Volatility

HQIFX vs. FLCCX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Equity Income Fund Class F (HQIFX) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX) at 0.00%. This indicates that HQIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HQIFXFLCCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

0.00%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

4.21%

+3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.22%

8.06%

+2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.61%

16.44%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

18.59%

-1.97%

HQIFX vs. FLCCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HQIFX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCCX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

HQIFX vs. FLCCX - Dividend Comparison

HQIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.30%, more than FLCCX's 6.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCCX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C
6.79%6.79%6.81%3.27%1.77%6.87%5.44%8.90%18.35%7.06%1.65%2.52%
HQIFX
Hartford Equity Income Fund Class F
12.30%13.04%10.07%7.97%13.25%9.19%3.01%15.01%11.12%7.12%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HQIFX and FLCCX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HQIFX has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to FLCCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HQIFX dropped -34.99% vs FLCCX's -65.81%.

HQIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HQIFX and FLCCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer