PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPYT.TO vs. QMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HPYT.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A (HPYT.TO) and Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HPYT.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HPYT.TO
Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A
-1.26%4.39%-5.96%9.08%
QMAX.TO
Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
-15.25%16.57%37.65%16.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPYT.TO achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly higher than QMAX.TO's -15.25% return.


HPYT.TO

1D
-1.15%
1M
-4.78%
YTD
-1.26%
6M
-2.11%
1Y
-1.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QMAX.TO

1D
3.55%
1M
-2.67%
YTD
-15.25%
6M
-14.61%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HPYT.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPYT.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HPYT.TO vs. QMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPYT.TO
HPYT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HPYT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPYT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPYT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
HPYT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPYT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

QMAX.TO
QMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
QMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPYT.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A (HPYT.TO) and Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HPYT.TOQMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.13

0.46

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.11

0.83

-0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.12

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

0.54

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.16

1.52

-1.68

HPYT.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPYT.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the QMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPYT.TO and QMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HPYT.TOQMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

0.46

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.88

-0.84

Correlation

The correlation between HPYT.TO and QMAX.TO is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HPYT.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

HPYT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.79%, more than QMAX.TO's 11.87% yield.


TTM202520242023
HPYT.TO
Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A
16.79%18.87%18.61%3.71%
QMAX.TO
Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
11.87%10.79%10.90%2.01%

Drawdowns

HPYT.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPYT.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.17%, smaller than the maximum QMAX.TO drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPYT.TO and QMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HPYT.TOQMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.17%

-26.77%

+13.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-22.86%

+15.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.22%

-20.12%

+11.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.76%

-5.29%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

8.16%

-4.74%

Volatility

HPYT.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A (HPYT.TO) is 3.47%, while Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that HPYT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HPYT.TOQMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

7.64%

-4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.70%

16.03%

-10.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.62%

26.26%

-16.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.08%

23.56%

-12.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.08%

23.56%

-12.48%