PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPRD.L vs. VUAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HPRD.L vs. VUAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HPRD.L is traded in USD, while VUAG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUAG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPRD.L achieves a 9.16% return, which is significantly higher than VUAG.L's 7.41% return.


HPRD.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
9.16%
6M
9.94%
1Y
13.55%
3Y*
10.92%
5Y*
1.60%
10Y*
4.05%

VUAG.L

1D
-0.73%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
7.41%
6M
7.19%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPRD.L vs. VUAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HPRD.L
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF
9.16%10.91%-0.18%10.87%-24.75%26.42%-8.90%7.57%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
7.41%17.61%25.21%25.96%-18.62%29.78%19.79%-10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HPRD.L and VUAG.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between HPRD.L and VUAG.L has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPRD.L vs. VUAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPRD.L
HPRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HPRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VUAG.L
VUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPRD.L vs. VUAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HPRD.LVUAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

2.49

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.84

10.34

-5.50

HPRD.L vs. VUAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPRD.L and VUAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HPRD.L vs. VUAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPRD.L drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, which is greater than VUAG.L's maximum drawdown of -37.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPRD.L and VUAG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPRD.LVUAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.80%

-37.82%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.11%

-8.69%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.26%

-18.69%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.48%

-25.18%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-3.13%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.09%

-7.05%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.10%

+0.70%

Volatility

HPRD.L vs. VUAG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L) is 3.53%, while Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that HPRD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPRD.LVUAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.78%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

8.60%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.15%

11.53%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

15.72%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

19.15%

-2.24%

HPRD.L vs. VUAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPRD.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAG.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HPRD.L vs. VUAG.L - Dividend Comparison

HPRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, while VUAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HPRD.L
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF
2.99%3.17%3.39%3.35%3.53%2.30%2.88%2.96%3.43%2.89%3.13%2.72%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HPRD.L and VUAG.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for HPRD.L.

HPRD.L is categorized as REIT, while VUAG.L is S&P 500. HPRD.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HPRD.L and 0.07% for VUAG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPRD.L and VUAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer