PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPQ vs. KO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HPQ vs. KO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HP Inc. (HPQ) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPQ achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than KO's 14.47% return. Over the past 10 years, HPQ has outperformed KO with an annualized return of 10.09%, while KO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.15% annualized return.


HPQ

1D
-2.74%
1M
19.48%
YTD
16.67%
6M
1.52%
1Y
8.80%
3Y*
-0.94%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
10.09%

KO

1D
3.46%
1M
0.32%
YTD
14.47%
6M
14.32%
1Y
15.33%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPQ vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HPQ
HP Inc.
16.67%-28.69%12.10%16.08%-26.40%57.25%24.11%3.88%-0.20%45.69%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
14.47%15.60%8.88%-4.43%10.61%11.37%2.47%20.60%6.77%14.38%

Correlation

The correlation between HPQ and KO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1962

0.27

The correlation between HPQ and KO shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HPQ:

$23.66B

KO:

$342.88B

EPS

HPQ:

$2.72

KO:

$3.18

PE Ratio

HPQ:

9.42

KO:

25.02

PS Ratio

HPQ:

0.42

KO:

6.96

PB Ratio

HPQ:

6.11

KO:

10.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

HPQ:

$57.42B

KO:

$49.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HPQ:

$11.61B

KO:

$30.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

HPQ:

$3.83B

KO:

$18.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPQ vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPQ
HPQ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
HPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
HPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

KO
KO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
KO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
KO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
KO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
KO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPQ vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HP Inc. (HPQ) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HPQKODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.17

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

1.95

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

3.82

-3.39

HPQ vs. KO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the KO Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPQ and KO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HPQKODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

0.94

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.65

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.50

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.53

-0.30

Drawdowns

HPQ vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPQ drawdown since its inception was -85.19%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPQ and KO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPQKODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.19%

-68.23%

-16.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.62%

-7.89%

-28.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.23%

-16.26%

-34.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.23%

-17.27%

-33.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.23%

-36.99%

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.34%

-2.98%

-27.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.87%

-16.09%

-14.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.52%

4.03%

+16.49%

Volatility

HPQ vs. KO - Volatility Comparison

HP Inc. (HPQ) has a higher volatility of 23.89% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 5.91%. This indicates that HPQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPQKODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.89%

5.91%

+17.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.20%

12.38%

+19.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.17%

16.37%

+23.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.78%

16.10%

+19.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.27%

18.20%

+17.07%

Dividends

HPQ vs. KO - Dividend Comparison

HPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than KO's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HPQ
HP Inc.
4.61%5.24%3.42%3.53%3.77%2.21%2.94%3.20%2.83%2.56%3.40%129.70%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
2.59%2.92%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%

Financials

HPQ vs. KO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HP Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B18.00B20222023202420252026
14.41B
12.47B
(HPQ) Total Revenue
(KO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HPQ vs. KO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between HP Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
20.9%
63.0%
Portfolio components
HPQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HP Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.02B and revenue of 14.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.9%.

KO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

HPQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HP Inc. reported an operating income of 612.00M and revenue of 14.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

KO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

HPQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HP Inc. reported a net income of 450.00M and revenue of 14.41B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

KO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HPQ and KO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HPQ has higher volatility (23.89%) compared to KO (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HPQ dropped -85.19% vs KO's -68.23%.

KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPQ and KO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer