HPJP.L vs. IDFF.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HPJP.L (HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF) and IDFF.L (iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - HPJP.L tracks the HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF while IDFF.L tracks the iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HPJP.L returned 9.93%/yr vs 24.00%/yr for IDFF.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HPJP.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IDFF.L.

Performance

HPJP.L vs. IDFF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJP.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IDFF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPJP.L achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly lower than IDFF.L's 26.95% return.

HPJP.L

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: -1.56%
• 6M: 2.77%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 1Y: 24.60%
• 3Y*: 9.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IDFF.L

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -8.33%
• 6M: 18.87%
• YTD: 26.95%
• 1Y: 48.14%
• 3Y*: 24.00%
• 5Y*: 7.12%
• 10Y*: 9.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPJP.L vs. IDFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HPJP.L HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF	7.76%	23.28%	-3.07%	16.34%	-24.08%	-1.77%
IDFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF	26.95%	39.49%	12.16%	1.47%	-21.79%	-2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between HPJP.L and IDFF.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021	0.57

The correlation between HPJP.L and IDFF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HPJP.L vs. IDFF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPJP.L

HPJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 39
HPJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
HPJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
HPJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
HPJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
HPJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 43

IDFF.L

IDFF.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
IDFF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
IDFF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
IDFF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
IDFF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
IDFF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPJP.L vs. IDFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJP.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IDFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HPJP.L	IDFF.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.93	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	2.52	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.35	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	3.79	-2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.75	11.11	-5.36

HPJP.L vs. IDFF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the IDFF.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPJP.L and IDFF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HPJP.L vs. IDFF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPJP.L drawdown since its inception was -33.79%, smaller than the maximum IDFF.L drawdown of -64.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPJP.L and IDFF.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HPJP.L	IDFF.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.79%	-64.08%	+30.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.95%	-12.63%	-1.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.10%	-19.77%	-4.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.69%	-10.89%	+6.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.31%	-18.18%	+2.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.27%	4.32%	-0.05%

Volatility

HPJP.L vs. IDFF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJP.L) is 7.80%, while iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IDFF.L) has a volatility of 10.68%. This indicates that HPJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HPJP.L	IDFF.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.80%	10.68%	-2.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.56%	22.07%	-3.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.49%	24.77%	-2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.74%	22.32%	+2.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.74%	20.81%	+3.93%

HPJP.L vs. IDFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPJP.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IDFF.L's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

HPJP.L vs. IDFF.L - Dividend Comparison

HPJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDFF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HPJP.L HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IDFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF	1.10%	1.46%	1.85%	1.85%	2.07%	1.39%	1.13%	1.67%	2.04%	1.50%	1.92%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HPJP.L and IDFF.L in my portfolio?

HPJP.L and IDFF.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HPJP.L or IDFF.L?

On fees, HPJP.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HPJP.L or IDFF.L?

HPJP.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDFF.L.

What is the main difference between HPJP.L and IDFF.L?

HPJP.L tracks HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF, while IDFF.L tracks iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HPJP.L and 0.74% for IDFF.L.