HPF vs. PGX
HPF (John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II) and PGX (Invesco Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, HPF returned 4.98%/yr vs 2.33%/yr for PGX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HPF charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for PGX.
Performance
HPF vs. PGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPF achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly higher than PGX's -0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, HPF has outperformed PGX with an annualized return of 4.98%, while PGX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.33% annualized return.
HPF
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 10.83%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.50%
- 10Y*
- 4.98%
PGX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- -0.38%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- -1.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.33%
HPF vs. PGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPF John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II | 2.93% | 6.34% | 14.41% | 10.78% | -18.44% | 17.90% | -7.67% | 27.95% | -5.38% | 14.74% |
PGX Invesco Preferred ETF | -0.64% | 3.48% | 6.53% | 9.48% | -21.16% | 3.15% | 7.09% | 17.09% | -4.01% | 10.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPF and PGX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2008 | 0.48 |
The correlation between HPF and PGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPF vs. PGX — Risk / Return Rank
HPF
PGX
HPF vs. PGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF) and Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HPF | PGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.12 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 0.84 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.71 | 1.76 | +2.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HPF vs. PGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPF drawdown since its inception was -66.73%, roughly equal to the maximum PGX drawdown of -66.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPF and PGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPF | PGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.73% | -66.44% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.18% | -4.98% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -11.17% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.24% | -24.67% | -6.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.76% | -34.10% | -20.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.56% | -5.74% | +3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -8.12% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 2.38% | -0.07% |
Volatility
HPF vs. PGX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF) has a higher volatility of 2.64% compared to Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX) at 1.56%. This indicates that HPF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPF | PGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 1.56% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.74% | 4.21% | +2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.16% | 6.19% | +1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 11.12% | +4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 13.03% | +9.05% |
HPF vs. PGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HPF has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than PGX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
HPF vs. PGX - Dividend Comparison
HPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.39%, more than PGX's 6.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPF John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II | 9.39% | 9.22% | 8.95% | 9.39% | 9.45% | 7.10% | 7.80% | 7.32% | 8.96% | 7.82% | 8.30% | 7.85% |
PGX Invesco Preferred ETF | 6.27% | 6.03% | 5.95% | 6.42% | 6.29% | 4.82% | 4.89% | 4.85% | 6.09% | 5.66% | 6.02% | 5.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HPF and PGX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HPF has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to PGX (1.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HPF dropped -66.73% vs PGX's -66.44%.
HPF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HPF and PGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer