HPAO.L vs. MVEW.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HPAO.L (HSBC MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF) and MVEW.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from HSBC and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HPAO.L returned 15.45%/yr vs 6.64%/yr for MVEW.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HPAO.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MVEW.L.

Performance

HPAO.L vs. MVEW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPAO.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPAO.L achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly higher than MVEW.L's 0.37% return.

HPAO.L

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 6.39%
• 6M: 6.65%
• 1Y: 22.00%
• 3Y*: 15.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MVEW.L

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: 0.14%
• 1Y: 3.27%
• 3Y*: 6.64%
• 5Y*: 6.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPAO.L vs. MVEW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HPAO.L HSBC MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF	6.39%	10.30%	20.31%	18.86%	-12.38%	11.05%
MVEW.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)	0.37%	3.73%	12.44%	4.00%	-0.60%	9.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HPAO.L and MVEW.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2021	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between HPAO.L and MVEW.L has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HPAO.L vs. MVEW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HPAO.L	MVEW.L
Technology	35.7%	22.6%
Financial Services	15.3%	15.2%
Healthcare	9.3%	14.9%
Communication Services	9.2%	10.5%
Industrials	9.1%	8.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	5.4%
Real Estate	6.9%	1.4%
Utilities	3.1%	6.7%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	10.2%
Energy	0.0%	3.3%

Return for Risk

HPAO.L vs. MVEW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPAO.L

HPAO.L Risk / Return Rank: 56
HPAO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
HPAO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
HPAO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 63
HPAO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
HPAO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

MVEW.L

MVEW.L Risk / Return Rank: 15
MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
MVEW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
MVEW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 14
MVEW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
MVEW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPAO.L vs. MVEW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPAO.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HPAO.L	MVEW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	0.41	+1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	0.64	+2.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.07	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	0.56	+1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.86	1.47	+6.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HPAO.L vs. MVEW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPAO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPAO.L and MVEW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HPAO.L	MVEW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	0.41	+1.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.60	+0.16

Drawdowns

HPAO.L vs. MVEW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPAO.L drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, which is greater than MVEW.L's maximum drawdown of -10.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPAO.L and MVEW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HPAO.L	MVEW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.46%	-10.07%	-9.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.96%	-5.85%	-4.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.46%	-9.04%	-10.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-3.02%	+2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-2.57%	-2.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	2.22%	+0.61%

Volatility

HPAO.L vs. MVEW.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPAO.L) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) at 2.63%. This indicates that HPAO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HPAO.L	MVEW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	2.63%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.89%	5.97%	+1.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.92%	8.00%	+2.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.89%	9.78%	+4.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.89%	10.08%	+3.81%

HPAO.L vs. MVEW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPAO.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MVEW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

HPAO.L vs. MVEW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HPAO.L nor MVEW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HPAO.L and MVEW.L in my portfolio?

HPAO.L and MVEW.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HPAO.L or MVEW.L?

On fees, HPAO.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HPAO.L or MVEW.L?

HPAO.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MVEW.L.

What is the main difference between HPAO.L and MVEW.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HPAO.L and 0.30% for MVEW.L.