HOYY vs. LQTI
HOYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HOYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
HOYY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOYY achieves a -31.03% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -0.80% return.
HOYY
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -4.16%
- 6M
- -19.22%
- YTD
- -31.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -0.80%
- 1Y
- 1.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $112.29K | $103.91K | $156.72K | |
| $2.19M | $2.25M | $1.69M |
HOYY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF | -31.03% | -23.57% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | -0.80% | 0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOYY and LQTI is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOYY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
HOYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQTI
HOYY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF (HOYY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOYY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.06 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOYY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOYY drawdown since its inception was -51.67%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOYY and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOYY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.67% | -3.41% | -48.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.60% | -2.38% | -48.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.68% | -0.99% | -34.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.37% | — |
Volatility
HOYY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOYY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.94% | 5.19% | +28.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.94% | 5.91% | +28.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.94% | 5.91% | +28.03% |
HOYY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOYY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
HOYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 232.02%, more than LQTI's 9.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF | 232.02% | 50.51% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.29% | 7.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOYY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for HOYY.
HOYY has the higher dividend yield at 232.02%, compared with 9.29% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for HOYY and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for HOYY and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer