HOU.TO vs. HXS.TO
HOU.TO (BetaPro Crude Oil Leveraged Daily Bull ETF) and HXS.TO (Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOU.TO is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Global X, while HXS.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. HOU.TO is actively managed, while HXS.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HOU.TO returned 2.29%/yr vs 15.94%/yr for HXS.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HOU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOU.TO achieves a 57.24% return, which is significantly higher than HXS.TO's 13.44% return.
HOU.TO
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -34.92%
- YTD
- 57.24%
- 6M
- 54.60%
- 1Y
- 31.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- -31.85%
HXS.TO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 13.44%
- 6M
- 12.73%
- 1Y
- 26.56%
- 3Y*
- 22.71%
- 5Y*
- 15.94%
- 10Y*
- —
HOU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOU.TO BetaPro Crude Oil Leveraged Daily Bull ETF | 57.24% | -29.90% | 9.54% | -26.61% | 21.66% | 115.44% | -98.65% | -2.23% |
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF | 13.44% | 11.93% | 34.98% | 23.22% | -12.72% | 27.30% | 15.78% | 15.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOU.TO and HXS.TO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2019 | 0.04 |
The correlation between HOU.TO and HXS.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOU.TO vs. HXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HOU.TO
HXS.TO
HOU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Crude Oil Leveraged Daily Bull ETF (HOU.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.39 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 3.05 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | 11.35 | -9.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOU.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than HXS.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOU.TO and HXS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -27.41% | -72.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.71% | -8.74% | -44.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.99% | -18.98% | -39.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.60% | -22.63% | -53.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -0.42% | -99.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -95.64% | -4.25% | -91.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.51% | 2.35% | +19.16% |
Volatility
HOU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro Crude Oil Leveraged Daily Bull ETF (HOU.TO) has a higher volatility of 23.66% compared to Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) at 4.85%. This indicates that HOU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.66% | 4.85% | +18.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.57% | 9.75% | +67.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.94% | 12.39% | +72.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.00% | 15.27% | +59.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.38% | 17.73% | +61.65% |
Dividends
HOU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HOU.TO nor HXS.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HOU.TO and HXS.TO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while HXS.TO is S&P 500.
Find the right allocation for HOU.TO and HXS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer