PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOLA vs. THEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOLA vs. THEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly higher than THEQ's 5.28% return.


HOLA

1D
-0.88%
1M
1.77%
YTD
5.56%
6M
4.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

THEQ

1D
-0.81%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
5.28%
6M
4.55%
1Y
15.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLA vs. THEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOLA and THEQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

0.69

HOLA vs. THEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HOLA
THEQ

Financial Services

25.7%
12.2%

Industrials

18.5%
7.7%

Technology

12.2%
35.6%

Healthcare

10.1%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
5.1%

Basic Materials

5.4%
1.7%

Communication Services

4.4%
10.8%

Utilities

4.3%
2.9%

Energy

3.4%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.6%

Financial Services

HOLA
25.7%
THEQ
12.2%

Industrials

HOLA
18.5%
THEQ
7.7%

Technology

HOLA
12.2%
THEQ
35.6%

Healthcare

HOLA
10.1%
THEQ
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HOLA
8.3%
THEQ
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

HOLA
6.6%
THEQ
5.1%

Basic Materials

HOLA
5.4%
THEQ
1.7%

Communication Services

HOLA
4.4%
THEQ
10.8%

Utilities

HOLA
4.3%
THEQ
2.9%

Energy

HOLA
3.4%
THEQ
3.6%

Real Estate

HOLA
1.0%
THEQ
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOLA vs. THEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOLA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


THEQ
THEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
THEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
THEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
THEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
THEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOLA vs. THEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOLATHEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.61

HOLA vs. THEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOLA vs. THEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, smaller than the maximum THEQ drawdown of -8.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and THEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOLATHEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-8.20%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-2.24%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-1.04%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

Volatility

HOLA vs. THEQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOLATHEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.93%

9.08%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.93%

11.66%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.93%

11.66%

-1.73%

HOLA vs. THEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than THEQ's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOLA vs. THEQ - Dividend Comparison

HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than THEQ's 0.75% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOLA and THEQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, THEQ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

THEQ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HOLA.

HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.75% for THEQ.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.46% for THEQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOLA and THEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer