PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOLA vs. JCPB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOLA vs. JCPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly higher than JCPB's 0.75% return.


HOLA

1D
0.28%
1M
1.14%
YTD
4.14%
6M
6.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JCPB

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.75%
6M
0.85%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
1.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLA vs. JCPB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOLA and JCPB is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.42

HOLA vs. JCPB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HOLA
JCPB

Financial Services

23.9%
13.9%

Industrials

15.5%
0.6%

Technology

11.9%
9.1%

Healthcare

9.5%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
1.4%

Basic Materials

5.2%
0.4%

Communication Services

3.1%
16.3%

Utilities

2.7%
1.9%

Energy

2.6%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.0%
4.6%

Financial Services

HOLA
23.9%
JCPB
13.9%

Industrials

HOLA
15.5%
JCPB
0.6%

Technology

HOLA
11.9%
JCPB
9.1%

Healthcare

HOLA
9.5%
JCPB
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

HOLA
6.5%
JCPB
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HOLA
6.2%
JCPB
1.4%

Basic Materials

HOLA
5.2%
JCPB
0.4%

Communication Services

HOLA
3.1%
JCPB
16.3%

Utilities

HOLA
2.7%
JCPB
1.9%

Energy

HOLA
2.6%
JCPB
1.6%

Real Estate

HOLA
1.0%
JCPB
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOLA vs. JCPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOLA

JCPB
JCPB Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOLA vs. JCPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOLA vs. JCPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOLAJCPBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

0.55

+0.89

Drawdowns

HOLA vs. JCPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, smaller than the maximum JCPB drawdown of -16.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and JCPB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOLAJCPBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-16.67%

+9.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-1.31%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-4.27%

+2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

Volatility

HOLA vs. JCPB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOLAJCPBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

3.78%

+5.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.52%

5.38%

+4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.52%

5.05%

+4.47%

HOLA vs. JCPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JCPB's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOLA vs. JCPB - Dividend Comparison

HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than JCPB's 4.92% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HOLA
JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
2.90%3.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
4.92%4.90%5.16%4.32%3.01%2.19%2.97%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOLA and JCPB have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JCPB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JCPB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HOLA.

JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 2.90% for HOLA.

HOLA is categorized as Equity Hedged, while JCPB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.38% for JCPB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOLA and JCPB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer