PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOLA vs. HEQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOLA vs. HEQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly higher than HEQQ's 2.90% return.


HOLA

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.53%
6M
1.89%
YTD
5.36%
1Y
13.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HEQQ

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.30%
6M
1.76%
YTD
2.90%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLA vs. HEQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOLA and HEQQ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

0.57

The correlation between HOLA and HEQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

HOLA vs. HEQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HOLA
HEQQ

Financial Services

25.7%
0.6%

Industrials

18.5%
2.6%

Technology

12.2%
58.4%

Healthcare

10.1%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
5.8%

Basic Materials

5.4%
0.6%

Communication Services

4.4%
14.0%

Utilities

4.3%
1.5%

Energy

3.4%
0.6%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.2%

Financial Services

HOLA
25.7%
HEQQ
0.6%

Industrials

HOLA
18.5%
HEQQ
2.6%

Technology

HOLA
12.2%
HEQQ
58.4%

Healthcare

HOLA
10.1%
HEQQ
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HOLA
8.3%
HEQQ
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

HOLA
6.6%
HEQQ
5.8%

Basic Materials

HOLA
5.4%
HEQQ
0.6%

Communication Services

HOLA
4.4%
HEQQ
14.0%

Utilities

HOLA
4.3%
HEQQ
1.5%

Energy

HOLA
3.4%
HEQQ
0.6%

Real Estate

HOLA
1.0%
HEQQ
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOLA vs. HEQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOLA
HOLA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HOLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOLA Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
HOLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOLA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

HEQQ
HEQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HEQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOLA vs. HEQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOLAHEQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.50

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.62

5.79

+0.84

HOLA vs. HEQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOLA Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the HEQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOLA and HEQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOLA vs. HEQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, smaller than the maximum HEQQ drawdown of -7.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and HEQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOLAHEQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-7.64%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-7.64%

+0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-2.23%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-1.13%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.98%

+0.12%

Volatility

HOLA vs. HEQQ - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ) at 2.52%. This indicates that HOLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOLAHEQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

2.52%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

6.85%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.93%

8.69%

+1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.92%

10.77%

-0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.92%

10.77%

-0.85%

HOLA vs. HEQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HOLA and HEQQ have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

HOLA vs. HEQQ - Dividend Comparison

HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than HEQQ's 0.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOLA and HEQQ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOLA has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to HEQQ (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOLA dropped -6.99% vs HEQQ's -7.64%.

On 1-year performance, HOLA leads with 13.85% vs 11.44% for HEQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, HEQQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HOLA has performed better with a 13.85% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOLA and HEQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 0.22% for HEQQ.

HOLA is categorized as Equity Hedged, while HEQQ is Nasdaq-100.

HOLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOLA and HEQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer