PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOLA vs. HEGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOLA vs. HEGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than HEGD's 7.52% return.


HOLA

1D
0.28%
1M
1.14%
YTD
4.14%
6M
6.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HEGD

1D
0.30%
1M
3.81%
YTD
7.52%
6M
7.26%
1Y
19.36%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLA vs. HEGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOLA and HEGD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.67

HOLA vs. HEGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HOLA
HEGD

Financial Services

23.9%
11.8%

Industrials

15.5%
8.2%

Technology

11.9%
36.1%

Healthcare

9.5%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
10.1%

Basic Materials

5.2%
1.8%

Communication Services

3.1%
11.0%

Utilities

2.7%
2.3%

Energy

2.6%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.9%

Financial Services

HOLA
23.9%
HEGD
11.8%

Industrials

HOLA
15.5%
HEGD
8.2%

Technology

HOLA
11.9%
HEGD
36.1%

Healthcare

HOLA
9.5%
HEGD
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

HOLA
6.5%
HEGD
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HOLA
6.2%
HEGD
10.1%

Basic Materials

HOLA
5.2%
HEGD
1.8%

Communication Services

HOLA
3.1%
HEGD
11.0%

Utilities

HOLA
2.7%
HEGD
2.3%

Energy

HOLA
2.6%
HEGD
3.5%

Real Estate

HOLA
1.0%
HEGD
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOLA vs. HEGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOLA

HEGD
HEGD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HEGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEGD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HEGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEGD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOLA vs. HEGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOLA vs. HEGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOLAHEGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

1.08

+0.36

Drawdowns

HOLA vs. HEGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, smaller than the maximum HEGD drawdown of -14.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and HEGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOLAHEGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-14.56%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

0.00%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-3.67%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

Volatility

HOLA vs. HEGD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOLAHEGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

6.92%

+2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.52%

9.40%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.52%

9.35%

+0.17%

HOLA vs. HEGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HEGD's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOLA vs. HEGD - Dividend Comparison

HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than HEGD's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HEGD
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF
0.33%0.36%0.43%0.39%0.87%0.31%
HOLA
JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
2.90%3.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOLA and HEGD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for HEGD.

HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.33% for HEGD.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Swan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.88% for HEGD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOLA and HEGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer