HOIBX vs. TCPYX
HOIBX (Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund) and TCPYX (Touchstone Impact Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, HOIBX returned 0.03%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TCPYX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HOIBX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for TCPYX.
Performance
HOIBX vs. TCPYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOIBX achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than TCPYX's 0.53% return.
HOIBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- —
TCPYX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.10%
- 10Y*
- 1.57%
HOIBX vs. TCPYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOIBX Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund | 0.20% | 6.55% | 1.69% | 5.75% | -13.38% | -1.13% | 8.70% | 4.68% |
TCPYX Touchstone Impact Bond Fund | 0.53% | 6.75% | 1.77% | 5.32% | -13.07% | -1.01% | 6.72% | 4.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOIBX and TCPYX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between HOIBX and TCPYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOIBX vs. TCPYX — Risk / Return Rank
HOIBX
TCPYX
HOIBX vs. TCPYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund (HOIBX) and Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOIBX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 1.93 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 5.85 | -0.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOIBX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.42 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.02 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.69 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
HOIBX vs. TCPYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOIBX drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, roughly equal to the maximum TCPYX drawdown of -18.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOIBX and TCPYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOIBX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -18.12% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.03% | -2.92% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.97% | -5.79% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.15% | -18.12% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -1.98% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -3.22% | -2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 0.96% | +0.08% |
Volatility
HOIBX vs. TCPYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund (HOIBX) is 1.38%, while Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that HOIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCPYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOIBX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.38% | 1.48% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.96% | 2.84% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.09% | 3.98% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.93% | 5.90% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.54% | 4.84% | +0.70% |
HOIBX vs. TCPYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOIBX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than TCPYX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOIBX vs. TCPYX - Dividend Comparison
HOIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than TCPYX's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOIBX Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.68% | 3.68% | 3.68% | 2.67% | 2.15% | 1.30% | 3.02% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TCPYX Touchstone Impact Bond Fund | 3.93% | 3.52% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.63% | 2.86% | 2.77% | 2.98% | 2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOIBX and TCPYX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCPYX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to HOIBX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOIBX dropped -18.15% vs TCPYX's -18.12%.
TCPYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOIBX and TCPYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer